The question asks to identify the Neolithic archaeological site from the list that is *not* known for ash-mounds.

Neolithic Ash-Mounds Explained

Ash-mounds are significant features found at several Neolithic sites, particularly in South India. They are large accumulations of burnt cattle dung ash, believed to be the result of periodic clearing and burning of cattle-penning areas. These mounds provide evidence of large-scale cattle-keeping practices during the Neolithic period.

Neolithic Sites Known for Ash-Mounds

Several Neolithic sites are famous for their extensive ash mounds:

• Utnur: Located in Telangana, Utnur is renowned for its massive ash mound, suggesting intensive cattle penning.
• Kupgal: Situated in Andhra Pradesh, Kupgal also features prominent ash mounds linked to Neolithic pastoral activities.
• Pallavoy: This site in Andhra Pradesh is another known location exhibiting ash-mound evidence from the Neolithic era.

Burzahom: The Neolithic Site Without Ash-Mounds

Burzahom, located in the Kashmir Valley, is a distinct Neolithic site. While it is known for other important archaeological features like:

• Pit dwellings
• Polished stone tools
• Unique burial practices (e.g., burying humans with dogs)

It is *not* associated with the characteristic ash mounds found in South Indian Neolithic sites. The site's environment and cultural practices differed significantly from those in the southern regions where ash-mounds are prevalent.

Conclusion

Therefore, Burzahom is the Neolithic archaeological site among the options provided that is not known for ash-mounds.