Which of the following is used to calculate flexural tensile strength of concrete?
Concrete is strong in compression but relatively weak in tension. Flexural tensile strength, also known as the Modulus of Rupture, is a measure of concrete's ability to resist bending forces that cause tensile stress. This property is crucial in the design of concrete structures like beams and pavements, where bending occurs.
Various empirical formulas are used to estimate the flexural tensile strength of concrete based on its compressive strength. One widely accepted formula, often found in design codes like IS 456:2000, relates the flexural tensile strength to the characteristic compressive strength of concrete.
The characteristic compressive strength, denoted as \( f_{ck} \), is the strength below which not more than 5% of the test results are expected to fall. It is usually measured from standard cylinder or cube tests.
The formula commonly used to calculate the flexural tensile strength (Modulus of Rupture), \( f_{cr} \), from the characteristic compressive strength \( f_{ck} \) is:
\( f_{cr} = 0.7\sqrt{f_{ck}} \)
Here, \( f_{ck} \) is in MPa (or N/mm²), and the resulting \( f_{cr} \) is also in MPa.
Let's look at the provided options and compare them to the standard formula for flexural tensile strength:
\(\frac{280}{3 \times \sigma_{abc}}\): This formula involves \( \sigma_{abc} \), which typically represents the permissible bending compressive stress in concrete. This formula is not directly used for calculating the flexural tensile strength.\(5700\sqrt{f_{ck}}\): This formula is an empirical expression commonly used to estimate the modulus of elasticity of concrete, \( E_c \), in MPa, based on the characteristic compressive strength \( f_{ck} \). It is not the formula for flexural tensile strength.\(0.7\sqrt{f_{ck}}\): This formula directly matches the standard empirical expression used to calculate the flexural tensile strength (Modulus of Rupture) of concrete based on its characteristic compressive strength \( f_{ck} \).\(5000\sqrt{f_{ck}}\): This is another empirical formula, sometimes used to estimate the short-term static modulus of elasticity of concrete, \( E_c \), based on \( f_{ck} \). It is also not the formula for flexural tensile strength.Based on standard concrete design principles and code provisions, the formula used to calculate the flexural tensile strength (Modulus of Rupture) of concrete is \(0.7\sqrt{f_{ck}}\).
A stone is thrown horizontally from the top of a 20 m high building with a speed of 12 m/s. It hits the ground at a distance R from the building. Taking g = 10 m/s2 and neglecting air resistance will give :
A sphere of volume V is made of a material with lower density than water. While on Earth, it floats on water with its volume f1V (f1 < 1) submerged. On the other hand, on a spaceship accelerating with acceleration a < g (g is the acceleration due to gravity on Earth) in outer space, its submerged volume in water is f2V. Then:
A railway wagon (open at the top) of mass M1 is moving with speed v1 along a straight track. As a result of rain, after some time it gets partially filled with water so that the mass of the wagon becomes M2 and speed becomes v2. Taking the rain to be falling vertically and the water stationery inside the wagon, the relation between the two speeds v1 and v2 is :
Consider the following statements:
1. Distance between the longitudes becomes zero on North Pole and South Pole.
2. Distance between the longitudes is maximum on the Equator.
3. Number of longitudes is more than number of latitudes.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
One block of 2⋅0 kg mass is placed on top of another block of 3⋅0 kg mass. The coefficient of static friction between the two blocks is 0⋅2. The bottom block is pulled with a horizontal force F such that both the blocks move together without slipping. Taking acceleration due to gravity as 10 m/s2, the maximum value of the frictional force is :