Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) refers to a business's commitment to behave ethically and contribute to economic development while improving the quality of life of the workforce, their families, the local community, and society at large. In India, specific provisions related to CSR were significantly strengthened by the Companies Act, 2013.
Let's examine each statement provided in the options to determine which one is not true in the context of CSR, particularly concerning Indian regulations like the Companies Act, 2013.
This statement suggests that a CSR Committee should consist of only one Director. However, according to Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013, every company falling under the specified criteria must constitute a CSR Committee. This committee must comprise at least three directors, with at least one director being an independent director.
Therefore, the statement that the CSR Committee should consist of only one Director is not true.
This statement claims that the CSR provision was introduced by the Companies Act, 2013. This is factually correct. The Companies Act, 2013, mandated CSR spending for eligible companies, marking a significant development in corporate governance and social accountability in India.
Thus, this statement is true.
This statement mentions that a company should spend at least 2% of its average net profits made during the immediately preceding three financial years on CSR activities. This aligns with the mandate under the Companies Act, 2013 (Section 135(5)), which requires companies to spend, in every financial year, at least 2% of the average net profits calculated in accordance with the applicable accounting standards.
Hence, this statement is true.
This statement defines CSR as an implied agreement between a company and society, aiming to provide benefits through goods and services. This reflects the generally accepted concept of CSR, where businesses integrate social and environmental concerns into their operations and interactions with stakeholders, contributing positively to society.
Therefore, this statement is considered a conceptually true description of CSR.
Based on the analysis, the statement that is factually incorrect according to the regulations and common understanding of CSR is the one regarding the composition of the CSR Committee.
The specific requirement under the Companies Act, 2013, is for the CSR Committee to have a minimum of three directors, not just one.
| LIST-I Position of Directors | LIST-II Case laws |
|---|---|
| A. Directors as 'Agents' | I. Ferguson v/s Wilson |
| B. Directors as 'Employees' | II. R.R. Kothandraman v/s Commr. of Income Tax |
| C. Directors as 'Trustees' | III. Great Eastern Rly. Co. v/s Turner |
| D. Directors in a 'Fiduciary relationship' | IV. Forest of Dean Coal Mining Co. Re |
Arrange the following steps of incorporation of a new Limited Liability Partnership in proper sequence.
A. Reserve LLP Name
B. Preparation of Documents for Incorporation of LLP
C. Procure Digital Signature Certificate
D. LLP incorporation and DIN Application and apply for PAN and TAN
E. Drafting and filling LLP Agreement
Choose the correct answer from the options given below: