Distinguishing Features of the Liberal Communitarian Debate
The liberal communitarian debate centers on fundamental disagreements about the nature of the self, the role of the state, and the source of values. Liberals tend to emphasize individual autonomy and universal principles, often viewing the self as independent of specific social roles (unencumbered). Communitarians argue that the self is constituted by its social and historical context (encumbered) and emphasize the importance of shared values and traditions, questioning state neutrality.
Analysis of Options
- Option 1: Conception of self : 'encumbered' vs. 'unencumbered'
This contrast is central to the debate. Liberals often posit an 'unencumbered' self, while communitarians argue for an 'encumbered' self shaped by community.
This IS a feature. - Option 2: 'Universalism' vs. 'Particularism'
This reflects the disagreement on whether moral and political principles apply universally (liberal view) or are specific to particular communities and traditions (communitarian view).
This IS a feature. - Option 3: 'State neutrality' vs. 'non-neutrality of State'
Liberals advocate for a state neutral towards different conceptions of the good life, whereas communitarians question whether such neutrality is possible or desirable, suggesting the state might need to affirm certain common goods.
This IS a feature. - Option 4: Totalitarianism : 'procedural' vs. 'communitarian'
The liberal communitarian debate does not typically involve distinguishing forms of totalitarianism using these specific terms. While concepts like procedural justice (often associated with liberalism) are discussed, this option frames a distinction unrelated to the core arguments about individual rights, community, and state roles within the liberal-communitarian framework.
This IS NOT a feature.
Conclusion
The distinction between 'procedural' and 'communitarian' forms of totalitarianism is not a standard element or point of contention within the philosophical discourse between liberalism and communitarianism. The other options represent core themes of the debate.
Important Questions from Political Theory
Which of the following statements is not correct about Austin’s Concept of Sovereignty?
Who among the following made the statement: "Sovereignty is the supreme power of the State, over citizens and subjects unrestrained by law"?
Who has written that "The Leviathan of the state of the nature of Hobbes can never be a man"?
- Which of the following are correct statements?
A. Universalist argue that everyone is entitled to the same basic rights simply by virtue of their humanity
B. Cultural relativism means opposition of western values
C. Universalist do not consider polygamy as violation of gender equality or rights of women
D. Cultural relativism posits that human rights should be defined and interpreted within cultural framework of particular society
Choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below : - Rights are the external conditions necessary for the greatest possible development of the capacities of the personality. This statement belongs to :
