All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

Which of the following case decided by the Supreme Court of India deals with the concept of 'Public Wrong'
under Tort?

The correct answer is
Sebastin M V/s Union of India

Understanding 'Public Wrong' in Indian Tort Law

A 'Public Wrong', in the context of Tort law, refers to an act that is considered an offense against the public or the state, rather than solely against an individual. While often associated with criminal law, certain public wrongs can also form the basis for civil action under tort.

Relevant Supreme Court Case

The Supreme Court of India addressed the concept related to public wrongs in the context of tortious liability in the case of Sebastin M. V/s Union of India.

Case Analysis

  • The case involved assessing the liability of the state for tortious acts.
  • It clarified principles concerning wrongs that affect public interest or are committed by public authorities, touching upon the distinction and overlap between public wrongs and private wrongs actionable in tort.

Therefore, Sebastin M. V/s Union of India is the relevant case concerning the concept of 'Public Wrong' under Tort.

Was this answer helpful?

Important Questions from Law of Torts and Consumer Protection

  1. A philosophy of punishments that aims to prevent criminal activity through the development and application of effective sanctions is called:
  2. Only a proportion of crimes committed find their way into Criminal Justice Process, is called:
  3. Match LIST-I with LIST-II
    LIST-ILIST-II
    A.HedonismII.In Pursuit of Pleasure
    B.Hidden CrimeI.Crimes not Recorded in Official Crime
    Data
    C.IncapacitationIV.Removal of Offenders' Ability to
    Commit Crime
    D.IncarcerationIII.The Process of Confining or Segregating
    Offending Populations

    Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
  4. Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
     

    List – ICase LawList – IIConcept
    AAshby v/s WhiteIIViolation of absolute right
    BRylands v/s FletcherIIIStrict liability
    COlga Tellis v/s Bombay Municipal Corp.IPoverty as an involuntary act under Tort
    DAllen v/s FloodIVMotive is irrelevant in Tort





    Choose the correct answer from the options given below:

     

  5. Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
    LIST-I
    (Theory)
    LIST-II
    (Propounder)
    A. Pigeon Hole TheoryI. William Prosser
    B. Neighbour RuleII. Wenfield
    C. Tort is Social EngineeringIII. Lord Atkin
    D. Use of phrase 'Law of Tort'IV. Salmond

    Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
Need Expert Advice?

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App