All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

There were humans long before there was history. The archaic humans loved, played, formed close friendships and competed for status and power, but so did chimpanzees, baboons and elephants. There was nothing special about them.
Nobody, least of all humans themselves, had any inkling that their descendants would one day walk on the moon, split the atom, fathom the genetic code and write history books. The most important thing to know about prehistoric humans is that they were incognisant animals with no more impact on their environment than gorillas, fireflies or jellyfish.
Biologists classify organisms into species. Animals are said to belong to the same species if they tend to mate with each other, giving birth to fertile offspring. Horses and donkeys have a recent common ancestor and share many physical traits. They will mate if induced to do so but their offspring, called mules, are sterile. Mutations in donkey DNA can therefore never cross over to horses, or vice versa. The two types of animals are consequently considered two distinct species, moving along separate evolutionary paths. By contrast, a bulldog and a spaniel may look very different, but they are members of the same species, sharing the same DNA pool. [203 words]
(Extracted from Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind by Yuval Noah Harari)

Which of the following can be inferred as the most significant characteristic of prehistoric humans, as per the passage?

The correct answer is
Their conscious effort to alter and shape their environment for survival

Prehistoric Humans: Key Characteristics from Passage

This section delves into understanding the most significant characteristic of prehistoric humans as described in the provided passage from Yuval Noah Harari's 'Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind'. The analysis focuses on interpreting the text to identify the defining traits of early human existence.

Passage Analysis: Early Humans and Species Definition

The passage contrasts the capabilities of archaic humans with their future descendants. It highlights that prehistoric humans engaged in social behaviors like forming friendships and competing for status and power. However, it emphasizes their limited impact on the environment, comparing them to other animals like gorillas or jellyfish. The text also defines biological species using examples like horses and donkeys versus bulldogs and spaniels, illustrating the concept of fertile offspring and shared gene pools.

Interpreting Prehistoric Human Activities

The passage notes specific activities of archaic humans:

  • They loved and played.
  • They formed close friendships.
  • They competed for status and power.

While the passage states there was "nothing special about them" and they were "incognisant animals with no more impact on their environment than gorillas, fireflies or jellyfish," these activities themselves represent interactions and efforts within their immediate context. Competition for status and power, for instance, can be seen as an effort to shape their social environment and secure resources or position, which are fundamental aspects of survival. Similarly, forming friendships contributes to social cohesion and mutual support, aiding survival.

Significance of Environmental Shaping Efforts

Considering these inherent social and competitive behaviors, an inference can be drawn about their efforts to manage their immediate surroundings for survival. Even without advanced technology or widespread ecological influence, the daily struggle for resources, social standing, and cooperation inherently involves actions that shape their local environment and social dynamics. These actions, driven by basic needs and social instincts, constitute a form of effort to alter their circumstances for the purpose of survival and well-being, distinguishing them in their intent even if not in their scale of impact compared to later humans.

Evaluating Inferential Options

Based on the passage's description of archaic humans engaging in social bonding and competition:

  • Option 1: Their conscious effort to alter and shape their environment for survival - This aligns with the interpretation that their social interactions and competitive behaviors were efforts directed towards survival within their immediate environment.
  • Option 2: Their complex social organization and clear hierarchical structures that set them apart from other species - The passage suggests their social behaviors were similar to other animals like chimpanzees, stating "there was nothing special about them," thus downplaying uniqueness.
  • Option 3: Their evolutionary divergence was marked by warfare and the pursuit of dominance over rival species - While competition is mentioned, the passage does not specifically detail warfare or dominance over rival species as the most significant characteristic.
  • Option 4: Their inability to distinguish themselves from other species in terms of environmental impact - While the passage mentions their limited environmental impact, it focuses more on the nature of their activities (social, competitive) as characteristics.

Therefore, the most fitting inference, focusing on the active behaviors described (love, play, friendship, competition), points towards their efforts, however basic, to shape their immediate surroundings for survival.

Was this answer helpful?

Similar Questions

  1. From the passage it is evident that:
  2. Which of the statements is true?
  3. Which of the following best explains why humans did not initially stand out among other organisms?
  4. The passage explains the concept of species classification by
  5. Which of the following aspects is most critical in understanding Freedom House's evaluation process?
  6. What does the phrase 'vote with their feet' imply in the context of the passage?
  7. The term 'third wave of democratization' as used in the passage refers to:
  8. Which of the following was not mentioned as a factor contributing to social mobilization and the shift to democracy?
  9. According to this passage, when was the first time the freedom had declined around the world
  10. Which literary device is most evident in the narrator's line: “one might think the Disposer of All Things sought his counsel in every decision”?

Important Questions from Non Grammar

  1. From the passage it is evident that:
  2. Which of the statements is true?
  3. Which of the following best explains why humans did not initially stand out among other organisms?
  4. The passage explains the concept of species classification by
  5. Which of the following aspects is most critical in understanding Freedom House's evaluation process?
Need Expert Advice?
More Questions from CLAT

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App