Given this historical context, it is understandable that Bentham used reason and science to explain human behaviour. His ethical system was an attempt to quantify happiness and the good so they would meet the conditions of the scientific method. Ethics had to be empirical, quantifiable, verifiable, and reproducible across time and space. Just as science was beginning to understand the workings of cause and effect in the body, so ethics would explain the causal relationships of the mind. Bentham rejected religious authority and wrote a rebuttal to the Declaration of Independence in which he railed against natural rights as “rhetorical nonsense, nonsense upon stilts." Instead, the fundamental unit of human action for him was utility-solid, certain, and factual.
What is utility? Bentham's fundamental axiom, which underlies utilitarianism, was that all social morals and government legislation should aim for producing the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. Utilitarianism, therefore, emphasizes the consequences or ultimate purpose of an act rather than the character of the actor, the actor's motivation, or the particular circumstances surrounding the act. It has these characteristics: (1) universality, because it applies to all acts of human behaviour, even those that appear to be done from altruistic motives; (2) objectivity, meaning it operates beyond individual thought, desire, and perspective; (3) rationality, because it is not based in metaphysics or theology; and (4) quantifiability in its reliance on utility. (353 words)
(Extracted from Michael Quinn, “Jeremy Bentham, “The Psychology of Economic Man,' and Behavioural Economics,” Oeconomia 6, no. 1 (2016): 3–32)
Utilitarianism: Emphasis on Consequences
The question asks to identify which aspect of an act Utilitarianism, as described in the provided text, emphasizes most strongly compared to other factors.
Understanding Utilitarianism's Core Principle
The text introduces Jeremy Bentham's ethical system, Utilitarianism, and explains its fundamental basis. It highlights that Bentham aimed to quantify happiness and good using reason and science, making ethics empirical, quantifiable, and verifiable. Instead of religious authority or natural rights, Bentham focused on "utility" as the fundamental unit of human action.
Identifying Utilitarianism's Primary Focus
The text explicitly states the core principle of Utilitarianism:
"Utilitarianism, therefore, emphasizes the consequences or ultimate purpose of an act rather than the character of the actor, the actor's motivation, or the particular circumstances surrounding the act."
This sentence directly answers the question by contrasting the primary emphasis with other potential considerations.
Analyzing the Options
Based on the text, let's examine why each option is considered less emphasized than the consequences:
- The character of the actor: The text explicitly states that Utilitarianism emphasizes consequences "rather than the character of the actor." This means the actor's inherent traits are not the primary focus.
- The actor's motivation: Similarly, the text indicates that Utilitarianism looks at the outcome "rather than... the actor's motivation." While motivation might be considered in some ethical systems, it is secondary to the results in Utilitarianism.
- The particular circumstances surrounding the act: The text also contrasts the emphasis on consequences with "the particular circumstances surrounding the act." Utilitarianism seeks a more universal principle, focusing on the outcome rather than the specific context in which the act occurred.
- The consequences or ultimate purpose of an act: This option directly matches the statement in the text. Utilitarianism's central idea, the "greatest happiness for the greatest number," is determined by evaluating the outcomes or results of an action.
Conclusion on Utilitarianism's Emphasis
Therefore, according to the provided text describing Bentham's Utilitarianism, the aspect that is emphasized over the character of the actor, the actor's motivation, or the specific circumstances is the consequences or ultimate purpose of an act. This aligns with its focus on empirical, quantifiable results to achieve the greatest good for the most people.
Similar Questions
- From the passage it is evident that:
- Which of the statements is true?
- Which of the following can be inferred as the most significant characteristic of prehistoric humans, as per the passage?
- Which of the following best explains why humans did not initially stand out among other organisms?
- The passage explains the concept of species classification by
- Which of the following aspects is most critical in understanding Freedom House's evaluation process?
- What does the phrase 'vote with their feet' imply in the context of the passage?
- The term 'third wave of democratization' as used in the passage refers to:
- Which of the following was not mentioned as a factor contributing to social mobilization and the shift to democracy?
- According to this passage, when was the first time the freedom had declined around the world
Important Questions from Non Grammar
- From the passage it is evident that:
- Which of the statements is true?
- Which of the following can be inferred as the most significant characteristic of prehistoric humans, as per the passage?
- Which of the following best explains why humans did not initially stand out among other organisms?
- The passage explains the concept of species classification by
