All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

Which British policy allowed the annexation of Indian states whose rulers died without a natural heir?

The correct answer is
Doctrine of Lapse

Understanding the Doctrine of Lapse Policy

The question asks to identify the specific British policy that enabled the annexation of Indian states when their rulers passed away without leaving a natural successor. This policy was a significant tool used by the British East India Company to expand its territorial control over India.

Explaining the British Policy

Several policies were implemented by the British during their colonial rule in India, each serving different administrative and strategic purposes. Let's look at the options:

  • Dual Government: This system, prevalent in Bengal, involved a division of power between the Company and the Nawab, leading to administrative inefficiency and exploitation. It was not primarily about annexation based on succession.
  • Permanent Settlement: Introduced by Lord Cornwallis, this was a land revenue system that fixed the land revenue demand permanently. It aimed to secure a stable revenue source but did not directly deal with state annexation due to succession issues.
  • Doctrine of Lapse: This was a controversial British policy that stated that if a ruler of a protected Indian state died without a natural heir, his state would be annexed by the British. The state would then be under British rule. This policy was vigorously applied by Lord Dalhousie.
  • Subsidiary Alliance: Introduced by Lord Wellesley, this policy involved Indian states accepting British military protection in return for paying a subsidy and allowing a British resident. While it reduced the sovereignty of Indian states, it wasn't directly linked to annexation based on the absence of an heir.

The Doctrine of Lapse Explained

The Doctrine of Lapse was a policy that effectively meant that any Indian princely state under the direct control of the British East India Company, whose ruler died without a natural heir, would be annexed (taken over) by the Company. A 'natural heir' was typically understood as a son adopted with the prior approval of the Company or the British government. If a ruler adopted a son without this approval, or died heirless, the state was claimed by the British.

This policy was instrumental in the annexation of several Indian states, including Satara, Jaipur, Sambalpur, Jhansi, and Nagpur, significantly expanding British territory and influence.

Conclusion on Annexation Policy

Based on the explanation, the British policy that specifically allowed the annexation of Indian states whose rulers died without a natural heir was the Doctrine of Lapse.

Was this answer helpful?

Important Questions from Modern History

  1. Which British policy allowed the annexation of Indian states whose rulers died without a natural heir?
  2. Which of the following statements best describe the outcome of the British building the Coast Canal on the Odisha coast?
  3. The Brahmo Samaj, a socio-religious reform movement, was founded by:
  4. Who was the first president of the Indian National Congress in 1885?
  5. Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusion(s) logically follow(s) from the statements.
    Statements:
    Some petals are flowers.
    No flower is a bat.
    Conclusions:
    (I) Some petals are bats.
    (II) Some flowers are petals.
Need Expert Advice?

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App