The following table shows the distribution of number (in Lakhs) of Mobile Phones in seven different states and percentage distribution of these Phones among three different categories of people of India (High/Middle/ Low income) under the CONNECT Scheme. Total Mobile Phones distributed are 30 Lakhs. Some values (marked as '-') are missing in the table which you are expected to calculate if required. Based on the data in the table, answer the question. State-wise distribution of Mobile PhonesState Number of Mobile Phones Distributed (in lakhs) Distribution (%) of Mobile Phones among people with High Income Middle Income Low Income M.P. 6.5 15% - 50% Bihar 3.4 12% 32% - U.P. 2.5 8% 13% - Haryana 5.2 - 25% - Punjab - 21% 22% - Assam 4.2 - 9% 78% Kerala 4.7 15% - 60%
What is the ratio of distribution of Mobile Phones in Low income people of Bihar to the Middle income people of Kerala?
1904 ∶ 1175
The question asks for the ratio of mobile phones distributed to the low-income population in Bihar compared to the middle-income population in Kerala, based on the provided table showing state-wise and income-group distributions under the CONNECT Scheme.
The table provides the total number of mobile phones distributed in Lakhs for several states. It also shows the percentage distribution of these phones within each state among three income categories: High, Middle, and Low. The total number of mobile phones distributed across all states is given as 30 Lakhs. We need to use the state-specific data for Bihar and Kerala to find the required numbers for the ratio.
| State | Number of Mobile Phones Distributed (in lakhs) | Distribution (%) of Mobile Phones among people with High Income | Distribution (%) of Mobile Phones among people with Middle Income | Distribution (%) of Mobile Phones among people with Low Income |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M.P. | 6.5 | 15% | - | 50% |
| Bihar | 3.4 | 12% | 32% | - |
| U.P. | 2.5 | 8% | 13% | - |
| Haryana | 5.2 | - | 25% | - |
| Punjab | - | 21% | 22% | - |
| Assam | 4.2 | - | 9% | 78% |
| Kerala | 4.7 | 15% | - | 60% |
First, let's focus on Bihar. We need to find the number of mobile phones distributed to the low-income group in Bihar.
\[ \text{Low Income \% (Bihar)} = 100\% - \text{High Income \% (Bihar)} - \text{Middle Income \% (Bihar)} \]
\[ \text{Low Income \% (Bihar)} = 100\% - 12\% - 32\% = 100\% - 44\% = 56\% \]
\[ \text{Number of Phones (Low Income, Bihar)} = (\text{Low Income \% (Bihar)} / 100) \times \text{Total Phones (Bihar)} \]
\[ \text{Number of Phones (Low Income, Bihar)} = (56 / 100) \times 3.4 \text{ Lakhs} \]
\[ \text{Number of Phones (Low Income, Bihar)} = 0.56 \times 3.4 \text{ Lakhs} = 1.904 \text{ Lakhs} \]
Next, let's focus on Kerala. We need to find the number of mobile phones distributed to the middle-income group in Kerala.
\[ \text{Middle Income \% (Kerala)} = 100\% - \text{High Income \% (Kerala)} - \text{Low Income \% (Kerala)} \]
\[ \text{Middle Income \% (Kerala)} = 100\% - 15\% - 60\% = 100\% - 75\% = 25\% \]
\[ \text{Number of Phones (Middle Income, Kerala)} = (\text{Middle Income \% (Kerala)} / 100) \times \text{Total Phones (Kerala)} \]
\[ \text{Number of Phones (Middle Income, Kerala)} = (25 / 100) \times 4.7 \text{ Lakhs} \]
\[ \text{Number of Phones (Middle Income, Kerala)} = 0.25 \times 4.7 \text{ Lakhs} = 1.175 \text{ Lakhs} \]
We need the ratio of the number of Mobile Phones in Low income people of Bihar to the Middle income people of Kerala.
\[ \text{Ratio} = \text{Number of Phones (Low Income, Bihar)} : \text{Number of Phones (Middle Income, Kerala)} \]
\[ \text{Ratio} = 1.904 : 1.175 \]
To express this ratio as whole numbers, we can multiply both sides by 1000 to remove the decimal points:
\[ \text{Ratio} = 1.904 \times 1000 : 1.175 \times 1000 \]
\[ \text{Ratio} = 1904 : 1175 \]
We check if this ratio can be simplified. The prime factors of 1904 are \(2^4 \times 7 \times 17\). The prime factors of 1175 are \(5^2 \times 47\). Since there are no common prime factors, the ratio \(1904 : 1175\) is in its simplest form.
The ratio of distribution of Mobile Phones in Low income people of Bihar to the Middle income people of Kerala is 1904 : 1175.
| State | Group | Percentage (%) | Total Phones (Lakhs) | Number of Phones (Lakhs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bihar | Low Income | 100% - 12% - 32% = 56% | 3.4 | (56/100) * 3.4 = 1.904 |
| Kerala | Middle Income | 100% - 15% - 60% = 25% | 4.7 | (25/100) * 4.7 = 1.175 |
| Ratio (Bihar Low : Kerala Middle) = 1.904 : 1.175 = 1904 : 1175 | ||||
Data interpretation questions often involve analyzing tables, charts, or graphs to extract relevant information and perform calculations. Key skills required include:
Practicing with different types of data representations helps in improving data interpretation skills for exams like those involving the CONNECT Scheme data.
The table shows District-wise data of a number of primary school teachers posted in schools of a city.
Study the table and answer the question:
District | Male teachers | Female teachers |
East | 1650 | 2375 |
North | 1075 | 2651 |
West | 1280 | 1520 |
South | 1170 | 1085 |
Central | 690 | 859 |
Table shows income (in Rs. ) received by 4 employees of a company during the month of December 2020 and all their income sources.
Source | Amit | Suresh | Nitin | Varun |
Salary | 35000 | 38500 | 29000 | 42000 |
Arrears | 6000 | 6300 | 5000 | 7500 |
Bonus | 1000 | 1100 | 1000 | 1240 |
Overtime | 1800 | 1950 | 1400 | 1500 |
Study the table and answer the question:
Income (Rs.) | No. of persons |
Less than 200 | 12 |
Less than 250 | 26 |
Less than 300 | 34 |
Less than 350 | 40 |
Less than 400 | 50 |
The following table shows the annual profit of a company (in Rs. lakh).
2014-2015 | 2015-2016 | 2016-0217 | 2017-2018 | 2018-2019 |
625 | 690 | 725 | 775 | 815 |
The period which has the maximum percentage increase in profit over the previous year is:
The table given below shows the number of persons participating in a survey from 6 different states.
| States | Persons |
| S1 | 100 |
| S2 | 200 |
| S3 | 400 |
| S4 | 500 |
| S5 | 600 |
| S6 | 800 |
What is the ratio of number of person participating in a survey from state S3 to the number of person participating in a survey from state S4?