What percent of water must be mixed with honey so as to gain 20% by selling the mixture at
the cost price of honey ?
20%
This problem involves a concept often seen in profit and loss, specifically dealing with mixtures and calculating the percentage of an added ingredient (water) when a certain profit margin is achieved by selling the mixture at the cost price of the main ingredient (honey).
The key information is:
The gain comes solely from the water added, as water is assumed to have zero cost, while the selling price per unit of mixture is based on the cost price per unit of honey.
Let's assume a quantity of honey and its cost price to make the calculation straightforward.
So, 20% of water must be mixed with honey to achieve a 20% gain when selling the mixture at the cost price of honey.
| Item | Quantity (Assumed) | Cost per Unit (Assumed) | Total Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Honey | 100 units | Rs. 1 | Rs. 100 |
| Water | 20 units | Rs. 0 | Rs. 0 |
| Total Cost | Rs. 100 |
| Mixture Details | Value |
|---|---|
| Total Quantity of Mixture | 120 units |
| Selling Price per Unit of Mixture | Rs. 1 (Cost price of honey) |
| Total Selling Price | \(120 \times Rs. 1 = Rs. 120\) |
| Total Cost (of Honey) | Rs. 100 |
| Gain | \(Rs. 120 - Rs. 100 = Rs. 20\) |
| Gain Percentage | \( \left(\frac{Rs. 20}{Rs. 100}\right) \times 100\% = 20\% \) |
The percentage of water mixed with honey is \(\frac{\text{Quantity of Water}}{\text{Quantity of Honey}} \times 100\% = \frac{20}{100} \times 100\% = 20\%\).
| Concept | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Cost Price (CP) | The price at which an article (or ingredient like honey) is bought. |
| Selling Price (SP) | The price at which an article (or mixture) is sold. |
| Gain/Profit | \(SP - CP\) (when \(SP > CP\)). |
| Gain Percentage | \( \left(\frac{\text{Gain}}{\text{CP}}\right) \times 100\% \). This is typically calculated on the cost of the pure ingredient (honey in this case). |
| Mixture Problems | Problems involving mixing two or more ingredients, often with different costs, and calculating properties of the mixture. |
In problems involving mixtures where one ingredient (like water) has zero cost, any profit made when selling the mixture at a price related to the costly ingredient comes from the quantity of the zero-cost ingredient added. When the mixture is sold at the cost price of the original costly ingredient, the total selling price of the mixture will be greater than the cost of the original costly ingredient. The difference is the profit, and this profit is effectively 'earned' on the added quantity of the zero-cost ingredient.
The relationship between the quantity of the costly ingredient (\(Q_C\)) and the zero-cost ingredient (\(Q_Z\)) for a given profit percentage (P%) when selling the mixture at the cost price of the costly ingredient is often simplified to the ratio:
\[ \frac{Q_Z}{Q_C} = \frac{P}{100} \]In this honey and water problem:
So, \( \frac{Q_{water}}{Q_{honey}} = \frac{20}{100} = \frac{1}{5} \). This means for every 5 parts of honey, 1 part of water is added.
The percentage of water mixed with honey is \(\left(\frac{Q_{water}}{Q_{honey}}\right) \times 100\% = \frac{1}{5} \times 100\% = 20\%\).
This confirms the result obtained through the step-by-step calculation.
Which one of the following statements best reflects the critical message conveyed by the author of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. No country needs to depend on ecosystems to boost national income.
II. Resource-rich countries need to share their resources with those of scant resources so as to prevent the degradation of ecosystems.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the central idea of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. Path-dependent green investments will eventually most likely benefit growth as well as public finances in a country like India.
II. If other green technologies follow the same pattern as that of solar energy, there will most likely be an easy green transition.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Three prime numbers p, q and r, each less than 20, are such that p − q = q − r. How many distinct possible values can we get for (p + q + r)?