Underlying these changes in political systems was a massive social transformation as well. The shift to democracy was a result of millions of formerly passive individuals around the world organizing themselves and participating in the political life of their societies. This social mobilization was driven by a host of factors: greatly expanded access to education that made people more aware of themselves and the political world around them; information technology, which facilitated the rapid spread of ideas and knowledge; cheap travel and communications that allowed people to vote with their feet if they didn't like their government; and greater prosperity, which induced people to demand better protection of their rights.
The third wave crested after the late 1990s, however, a ‘democratic recession' emerged in the first decade of the twenty-first century. Approximately one in five countries that had been part of the third wave either reverted to authoritarianism or saw a significant erosion of democratic institutions. Freedom house noted that 2009 marked the fourth consecutive year in which freedom had declined around the world, the first time this had happened since it established its measures of freedom in 1973. [279 words]
(Extracted from The Origins of Political Order by Francis Fukuyama)
The passage discusses significant global political changes, particularly the spread of liberal democracy, often referred to as the "third wave of democratization." It highlights that this transformation involved a massive social mobilization, where individuals became more politically active due to factors like increased education, improved information technology, and greater prosperity.
One of the factors mentioned that facilitated this social mobilization and political change was:
"cheap travel and communications that allowed people to vote with their feet if they didn't like their government"
The idiom 'vote with their feet' generally signifies a way for people to express their opinion or dissatisfaction not through words or direct action within a system, but by physically moving away from it. In the context of governments and countries, as described in the passage, this implies:
Let's examine each option in relation to the meaning of 'vote with their feet' as implied by the passage:
This option describes participation in voting within a country's existing political system. While electoral processes are a fundamental way to demand political change, the phrase 'vote with their feet' specifically implies a different type of action, one involving movement and relocation rather than participation in local elections.
Public protests are a direct way to express political preferences and dissatisfaction. However, 'voting with feet' is distinct from protesting; it involves physically leaving a location rather than protesting within it.
This option directly aligns with the metaphorical meaning of 'vote with their feet.' It describes people expressing dissatisfaction with their current situation by moving (migrating) to other countries that they believe offer superior governance or living conditions. The mention of "cheap travel and communications" in the passage strongly supports this interpretation, as these factors enable migration.
Engaging in local government initiatives involves active participation within a community's existing structures. This is a form of internal political engagement and does not involve the act of leaving or relocating, which is central to the idiom 'vote with their feet.'