Under Article 191 of the Constitution of India, a person shall be disqualified for being chosen as, and for being, a member of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of a state if the person holds any office of profit under: 1. the Government of India. 2. any State Government. Select the correct answer using the code given below:
Let's understand the grounds for disqualification for members of the State Legislature in India, as outlined in the Constitution.
Article 191 of the Indian Constitution specifies the conditions under which a person is disqualified from being chosen as, and for being, a member of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of a state. One of the key grounds for disqualification is holding an 'office of profit'.
The term 'office of profit' is not explicitly defined in the Constitution. However, it generally refers to a position under the government (central or state) that brings some financial gain, advantage, or benefit. Holding such an office can potentially influence a legislator's ability to discharge their duties impartially, hence the disqualification rule.
According to Article 191(1)(a), a person is disqualified if they hold any office of profit under the Government of India or the Government of any State, other than an office declared by the State Legislature by law not to disqualify its holder.
The question asks whether a person is disqualified if they hold an office of profit under:
Based on the provisions of Article 191(1)(a):
The Article explicitly mentions both the Government of India and the Government of any State as entities under which holding an office of profit leads to disqualification (subject to the exceptions mentioned). Therefore, a person is disqualified if they hold such an office under either government (unless exempted).
Both conditions mentioned in the question are grounds for disqualification for a member of a State Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council under Article 191 of the Constitution of India, unless an exemption applies by law passed by the state legislature.
| Statement | Disqualification Ground? | As per Article 191(1)(a) |
|---|---|---|
| Holds office of profit under Government of India | Yes | Explicitly mentioned |
| Holds office of profit under any State Government | Yes | Explicitly mentioned |
| Article | Ground for Disqualification | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Article 191(1)(a) | Office of Profit | Holding office of profit under Govt. of India or Govt. of any State (unless exempted by state law). |
| Article 191(1)(b) | Unsound mind | Declared by a competent court. |
| Article 191(1)(c) | Undischarged insolvent | |
| Article 191(1)(d) | Not a citizen of India | Or voluntarily acquired citizenship of a foreign state, or under acknowledgement of allegiance to a foreign state. |
| Article 191(1)(e) | Disqualified by any law made by Parliament | e.g., Representation of the People Act, 1951. |
| Article 191(2) | Disqualification on ground of defection | As per Tenth Schedule. |
The concept of 'office of profit' has been a subject of legal interpretation by courts. Key aspects include:
Who has the power to recommend the dismissal of the state government and suspension or dissolution of the state assembly?
Which State Assembly passed the resolution on Sarna Code in November 2020?
Which of the following Articles of the Indian Constitution provides for a bicameral Parliament of India?
The total number of Ministers, including the Chief Minister, in the Council of Ministers in a State shall NOT exceed __________ of the total number of members of the Legislative Assembly of that State.
Which of the following statements are correct regarding composition of the State Legislative Council?
A. The maximum strength of the Council is fixed at one-third of the total strength of the Assembly.
B. The minimum strength of the Council is fixed at 40.
C. A total of \(\frac{5}{6}\) of the total number of members of a Legislative Council are indirectly elected and \(\frac{1}{6}\) members are nominated.
D. The nominations (nominated members) made by the Governor can be challenged in the court.