Genetic drift refers to random fluctuations in allele frequencies within a population from one generation to the next. This process is driven by chance events, especially during reproduction.
A key consequence of genetic drift is the loss of genetic variation, specifically a reduction in heterozygosity over time. The strength of genetic drift is inversely proportional to population size; it is a much more potent force in smaller populations.
We are given two populations:
Both populations start with the same allele frequencies ($p=0.5$, $q=0.5$) and are observed after $t=1000$ generations.
The rate at which genetic drift reduces heterozygosity is significantly influenced by population size ($N$). The expected heterozygosity after $t$ generations, $H_t$, can be approximated by the formula:
$H_t \approx H_0 \left(1 - \frac{1}{2N}\right)^t$
where $H_0$ is the initial heterozygosity.
Therefore, after 1000 generations, population X (smaller size) will experience a more pronounced effect of genetic drift, leading to a greater loss of heterozygosity compared to population Y (larger size).
Consequently, population Y, with its larger size, will retain a higher level of heterozygosity than population X after 1000 generations of genetic drift.
In a population of birds on an island, the average beak size reduced over one generation. A researcher estimated the association between beak size and relative fitness, shown in the graph. The estimated slope was –0.05 with a 95% confidence interval of -0.15 to 0.09.

Which one of the following evolutionary processes acting on beak size is the most likely reason for the observed reduction in beak size?