A number is mistakenly divided by 4 instead of multiplying by 4. What is the percentage change
in the result due to this mistake?
93.75%
This problem asks us to find the percentage change in the result when a number is mistakenly divided by 4 instead of being multiplied by 4. Let's break down the calculation step-by-step.
Let the original number be represented by \(x\).
| Operation | Result |
|---|---|
| Correct (Multiply by 4) | \(4x\) |
| Incorrect (Divide by 4) | \( \frac{x}{4} \) |
The change in the result is the difference between the incorrect result and the correct result. However, when calculating percentage change, we usually look at the magnitude of the difference relative to the original (correct) value. The difference in the result is:
\( \text{Difference} = \text{Correct Result} - \text{Incorrect Result} \)
\( \text{Difference} = 4x - \frac{x}{4} \)
To subtract these terms, we find a common denominator, which is 4:
\( \text{Difference} = \frac{4 \times 4x}{4} - \frac{x}{4} = \frac{16x}{4} - \frac{x}{4} = \frac{16x - x}{4} = \frac{15x}{4} \)
The percentage change is calculated using the formula:
\( \text{Percentage Change} = \left( \frac{\text{Change in Result}}{\text{Original (Correct) Result}} \right) \times 100\% \)
In this case, the "Change in Result" is the difference we found in Step 3, and the "Original (Correct) Result" is \(4x\). Substituting the values:
\( \text{Percentage Change} = \left( \frac{\frac{15x}{4}}{4x} \right) \times 100\% \)
To simplify the fraction \( \frac{\frac{15x}{4}}{4x} \), we can write it as \( \frac{15x}{4} \div 4x \):
\( \frac{15x}{4} \div 4x = \frac{15x}{4} \times \frac{1}{4x} \)
We can cancel out \(x\) from the numerator and the denominator (assuming \(x \ne 0\), as the question implies a non-zero number):
\( \frac{15\cancel{x}}{4} \times \frac{1}{4\cancel{x}} = \frac{15}{4 \times 4} = \frac{15}{16} \)
Now, calculate the percentage change:
\( \text{Percentage Change} = \frac{15}{16} \times 100\% \)
\( \frac{15}{16} \times 100 = \frac{1500}{16} \)
Let's simplify the fraction:
Alternatively, direct calculation:
\( \frac{1500}{16} = \frac{750}{8} = \frac{375}{4} = 93.75 \)
The percentage change is 93.75%. Since the incorrect result (\( \frac{x}{4} \)) is much smaller than the correct result (\(4x\)), this represents a large percentage decrease in the result.
| Concept | Formula |
|---|---|
| Correct Result | Original Value \( \times \) Correct Operation Factor |
| Incorrect Result | Original Value \( \div \) Incorrect Operation Factor |
| Change in Result | Correct Result - Incorrect Result |
| Percentage Change | \( \left( \frac{\text{Change in Result}}{\text{Original (Correct) Result}} \right) \times 100\% \) |
Errors in calculations, like using the wrong operation (division instead of multiplication) or the wrong number, can lead to significant percentage changes in the final result. It's important to identify the intended correct value and the obtained incorrect value to accurately calculate the percentage change.
In this specific problem:
Notice that the incorrect result is \( \frac{x/4}{4x} = \frac{x}{4} \times \frac{1}{4x} = \frac{1}{16} \) of the correct result. This means the incorrect result is only 6.25% of the correct result (since \( \frac{1}{16} \times 100\% = 6.25\% \)). The difference is the remaining portion: \( 100\% - 6.25\% = 93.75\% \). This confirms our calculation of the percentage change.
The percentage change is calculated relative to the correct value, quantifying how much the error affected the outcome compared to what it should have been.
Which one of the following statements best reflects the critical message conveyed by the author of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. No country needs to depend on ecosystems to boost national income.
II. Resource-rich countries need to share their resources with those of scant resources so as to prevent the degradation of ecosystems.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Which one of the following statements best reflects the central idea of the passage?
With reference to the above passage, the following assumptions have been made:
I. Path-dependent green investments will eventually most likely benefit growth as well as public finances in a country like India.
II. If other green technologies follow the same pattern as that of solar energy, there will most likely be an easy green transition.
Which of the above assumptions is/are valid?
Three prime numbers p, q and r, each less than 20, are such that p − q = q − r. How many distinct possible values can we get for (p + q + r)?