The `Swadeshi' and 'Boycott' were adopted as methods of struggle for the first time during the
agitation against the Partition of Bengal
The question asks about the historical period when the methods of 'Swadeshi' and 'Boycott' were first adopted as significant strategies of struggle in the Indian national movement. These two methods became powerful tools in the hands of Indian nationalists to challenge British rule.
Let's examine each option to determine when Swadeshi and Boycott were first used as prominent methods of struggle.
1. Agitation against the Partition of Bengal:
The Partition of Bengal was announced by Lord Curzon in 1905. This move was seen by Indian nationalists as an attempt to divide the Bengali people on communal lines and weaken the national movement. The response to the partition was widespread and intense agitation. It was during this movement that Swadeshi and Boycott were adopted on a large scale as powerful tools of protest. The Swadeshi call urged people to use Indian-made goods, while the Boycott call targeted British goods, especially textiles. This movement marked the first time these methods were used so extensively and effectively as a mass political strategy.
2. Home Rule Movement:
The Home Rule Movement (1916-1918), led by leaders like Annie Besant and Bal Gangadhar Tilak, aimed at achieving self-government for India within the British Empire. While it involved widespread political meetings, propaganda, and organization, its primary methods focused on political education and agitation for Home Rule, not initiating the Swadeshi and Boycott methods, which were already in use by then.
3. Non-Cooperation Movement:
The Non-Cooperation Movement (1920-1922) was a major movement led by Mahatma Gandhi. It involved boycotting British institutions (schools, colleges, law courts, legislative councils) and foreign goods, as well as surrendering titles and honours bestowed by the British. While Boycott was a key method, this movement occurred much later than the agitation against the Partition of Bengal and built upon the strategies that had emerged earlier.
4. Visit of the Simon Commission to India:
The Simon Commission was a group from Britain that visited India in 1928 to suggest constitutional reforms. It faced widespread protests across India because it did not include any Indian members. The main method of protest was boycotting the commission itself, with slogans like 'Simon Go Back'. While a form of boycott, it was specific to the commission and occurred much later, and the general methods of Swadeshi and Boycott had been established long before.
Comparing the timelines and methods used in these movements, it is clear that the agitation against the Partition of Bengal in 1905 was the first major instance where Swadeshi and Boycott were adopted as widespread and organized methods of political struggle. This movement provided a template for future campaigns in the Indian national movement.
| Movement/Event | Period | Key Methods of Struggle | Were Swadeshi & Boycott First Used Here? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agitation against Partition of Bengal | 1905-1908 | Swadeshi, Boycott, public meetings, protests | Yes, adopted as major, widespread methods for the first time. |
| Home Rule Movement | 1916-1918 | Political agitation, meetings, propaganda for self-government | No, focused on political education & demand for Home Rule. |
| Non-Cooperation Movement | 1920-1922 | Boycott of British institutions & goods, non-cooperation | No, used boycott extensively, but initiated later. |
| Visit of Simon Commission | 1928 | Boycott of the commission, protests | No, specific boycott of the commission, occurred later. |
| Movement | Approximate Period | Key Focus | Notable Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agitation against Partition of Bengal | 1905-1908 | Annulment of Bengal Partition | Swadeshi, Boycott of foreign goods |
| Home Rule Movement | 1916-1918 | Self-government (Home Rule) | Public meetings, propaganda, organizing |
| Non-Cooperation Movement | 1920-1922 | Swaraj (Self-rule) | Boycott of institutions & foreign goods, non-cooperation |
| Civil Disobedience Movement | 1930-1934 | Complete Independence (Purna Swaraj) | Breaching specific laws (e.g., Salt Law), boycott, non-payment of taxes |
| Quit India Movement | 1942 | British withdrawal from India | Mass protest, non-violent resistance (in theory), disruption |
The Swadeshi and Boycott movements were not just political tools; they also had significant economic and cultural dimensions. The Swadeshi call led to the establishment of numerous Indian-owned factories, banks, insurance companies, and educational institutions. The Boycott of foreign goods aimed to hit British economic interests in India. Culturally, the movement fostered a sense of national pride and identity. Leaders like Surendranath Banerjea, K.K. Mitra, and later Extremist leaders like Bal Gangadhar Tilak, Bipin Chandra Pal, and Lala Lajpat Rai played crucial roles in popularizing these methods during the anti-Partition agitation.
The Montague-Chelmsford Proposals were related to
Consider the following :
1. Calcutta Unitarian Committee
2. Tabernacle of New Dispensation 3. Indian Reform Association
Keshab Chandra Sen is associated with the establishment of which of the above?
What was the main reason for the split in the Indian National Congress at Surat in 1907?
The plan of Sir Stafford Cripps envisaged that after the Second World War
Who among the following was/were associated with the introduction of Ryotwari Settlement in India during the British rule?
1. Lord Cornwallis
2. Alexander Read
3. Thomas Munro
Select the correct answer using the code given below: