All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

The statements (S1), (S2), and (S3) pertain to the scores obtained by students in an exam. The maximum possible marks in the exam is 150.
(S1) The highest score is 100.
(S2) The fourth highest score is 76.
(S3) There are at least four students whose scores are within 25 of each other.
Which one of the following options is necessarily correct?

The correct answer is
(S1) and (S2) together imply (S3)

Analyzing Exam Score Logic

This solution analyzes three statements about student exam scores to determine which logical implication necessarily holds true.

Understanding the Statements

Let the student scores be ordered in descending order: $S_1 \ge S_2 \ge S_3 \ge S_4 \ge \dots$. The maximum possible score is 150.

  • (S1) The highest score is 100. This means $S_1 = 100$.
  • (S2) The fourth highest score is 76. This means $S_4 = 76$.
  • (S3) There are at least four students whose scores are within 25 of each other. This means there exist four scores $s_a, s_b, s_c, s_d$ such that $\max(s_a, s_b, s_c, s_d) - \min(s_a, s_b, s_c, s_d) \le 25$.

Evaluating Option A: (S1) and (S2) imply (S3)

Let's assume statements (S1) and (S2) are true.

  • From (S1), the highest score is $S_1 = 100$.
  • From (S2), the fourth highest score is $S_4 = 76$.
  • This gives us the four highest scores: $100, S_2, S_3, 76$. We know that $100 \ge S_2 \ge S_3 \ge 76$.
  • Consider these four scores: $100, S_2, S_3,$ and $76$.
  • The maximum score among these four is 100.
  • The minimum score among these four is 76.
  • The difference between the maximum and minimum of these four scores is $100 - 76 = 24$.
  • Since $24 \le 25$, these four scores ($100, S_2, S_3,$ and $76$) are within 25 of each other.
  • This directly satisfies the condition stated in (S3).

Therefore, statements (S1) and (S2) together necessarily imply statement (S3).

Evaluating Other Options

Let's briefly check why other options are not necessarily correct.

  • Option B ((S1) and (S3) imply (S2)): Consider scores {100, 90, 85, 80}. S1 is true (100). S3 is true ({100, 90, 85, 80} range is $100-80=20 \le 25$). But S2 is false (fourth score is 80, not 76). So, this is not necessarily correct.
  • Option C ((S2) and (S3) imply (S1)): Consider scores {110, 80, 79, 77, 76}. S2 is true (76). S3 is true ({80, 79, 77, 76} range is $80-76=4 \le 25$). But S1 is false (highest score is 110, not 100). So, this is not necessarily correct.
  • Option D ((S1) implies (S3)): Consider scores {100, 70, 60, 50}. S1 is true (100). S3 is false (no four scores are within 25; $100-50=50$). So, this is not necessarily correct.

Conclusion

Based on the analysis, only the combination of statements (S1) and (S2) guarantees that statement (S3) is true.

Was this answer helpful?

Important Questions from Critical Reasoning

  1. 'Little knowledge is a dangerous thing' is a decision based on:

  2. Which of the following is the assumption for the claim that 'Pleasure is desirable'?

  3. Read the given statements carefully and answer the questions.

    Fear of danger is more dangerous than danger itself. Risk is directly proportional= to danger

    Which of the following are true according to the given statements?

    A. Fear is worse than any fearful threat.

    B. There is a trade-off between risk and danger.

    C. There should be fear of danger.

    D. There is no need to take risks to overcome any danger.

  4. A question has been given in this question and a statement related to it. Read the passage carefully and review the statement based on it.

    Amazon has acknowledged the data violation of user names and email ids of some users without giving details of its nature or scope. Although the company has not disclosed the total number of users affected by this violation, it has sent information to all affected users about the technical problem. And now this e-commerce major company is offering Gift Cards as compensation to customers who are victims of their data violation. This e-commerce company headquartered in Seattle is offering Gift Cards between $ 5 to $ 100 for users affected by some of their data violations.

    A publication mentioning email communications between Amazon and a customer Paul Gagnon has reported that when he asked the customer service desk to ask the company how his information was leaked, then the company gave him a promotion of $ 100 Certificate offered. When Gagan got no response for the reason of this violation, he was offered $ 100 as an apology. After this violation, many affected users had filed a complaint with the service desk. Many people affected by this violation complained to the company, but none of them got so far. It is being speculated that Amazon Customer Service Supervisors have been instructed not to offer any comments or any kind of compensation to affected Amazon users.

    Statement: The company has not told the fixed number of people affected by data violation. Select the most suitable option below.

    A-statement is definitely true.

    B-Query is probably true.

    C-statement can not be determined.

    D-statement is completely false.

  5. A question has been given in this question and a statement related to it. Read the passage carefully and review the statement based on it.

    Amazon has acknowledged the data violation of the user name and email id of some of its users, without giving details of its nature or scope. Although the company has not disclosed the total number of users affected by this violation, it has sent information to all affected users about the technical problem. And now this e-commerce major company is offering Gift Cards as compensation to customers who are victims of their data violation. This e-commerce company headquartered in Seattle is offering Gift Cards between $ 5 to $ 100 for users affected by some of their data violations.

    A publication mentioning email communications between Amazon and a customer Paul Gagnon has reported that when he asked the customer service desk to ask the company how his information was leaked, then the company gave him a promotion of $ 100 Certificate offered. When Gagan got no response for the reason of this violation, he was offered $ 100 as an apology. After this violation, many affected users had filed a complaint with the service desk. Many people affected by this violation complained to the company, but none of them got so far. It is being speculated that Amazon Customer Service Supervisors have been instructed not to offer any comments or any kind of compensation to affected Amazon users.

    Statement: Amazon has not instructed its supervisors to not provide any comments or offers of compensation to the affected users.

    Select the most suitable option below.

    A-statement is definitely true.

    B-Query is probably true.

    C-statement can not be determined.

    D-statement is completely false.

Need Expert Advice?

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App