The table given below shows the distribution percentage of number of candidates qualifying a Common Entrance Test (CET) in six cities A-F during the year 2020 and 2021, along with the ratio of males (M) to females (F) among the qualified candidates. The total number of qualified candidates in all the six cities together during 2020 and 2021 are 3800 and 4600 respectively. Based on the data in the table, answer the question that follows: City-wise Distribution of CET Qualified Candidates. Year 2020 2021 City (Distribution % of Qualified Candidates) Ratio (Distribution % of Qualified Candidates) Ratio M ∶ F M ∶ F A 13% 8 ∶ 5 24% 5 ∶ 7 B 27% 11 ∶ 8 15% 12 ∶ 11 C 11% 7 ∶ 4 23% 15 ∶ 8 D 20% 2 ∶ 3 17% 8 ∶ 9 E 8% 5 ∶ 3 8% 1 ∶ 3 F 21% 13 ∶ 8 13% 5 ∶ 8
The number of females qualified from City-B in 2021 is approximately ___________ % more than the number of males qualified from City-E in the year 2020
73.68
The question asks us to find the approximate percentage by which the number of females qualified from City-B in 2021 is more than the number of males qualified from City-E in the year 2020. We need to use the provided table which contains the distribution percentage of qualified candidates across six cities (A-F) for the years 2020 and 2021, along with the male-to-female ratio for each city and year. The total number of qualified candidates for 2020 is 3800 and for 2021 is 4600.
| City | Year 2020 | Year 2021 | ||
| Distribution % | Ratio (M:F) | Distribution % | Ratio (M:F) | |
| A | 13% | 8 : 5 | 24% | 5 : 7 |
| B | 27% | 11 : 8 | 15% | 12 : 11 |
| C | 11% | 7 : 4 | 23% | 15 : 8 |
| D | 20% | 2 : 3 | 17% | 8 : 9 |
| E | 8% | 5 : 3 | 8% | 1 : 3 |
| F | 21% | 13 : 8 | 13% | 5 : 8 |
First, let's find the total number of qualified candidates in City-B in 2021. The total qualified candidates in 2021 across all cities is 4600. The distribution percentage for City-B in 2021 is 15%.
Total qualified candidates in City-B in 2021 = 15% of 4600
\( = \frac{15}{100} \times 4600 \)
\( = 15 \times 46 \)
\( = 690 \)
Now, we need to find the number of females among these 690 candidates. The male to female ratio for City-B in 2021 is 12:11. The total parts in the ratio are \(12 + 11 = 23\).
Number of females in City-B in 2021 = (Female ratio part / Total ratio parts) × Total qualified in City-B in 2021
\( = \frac{11}{23} \times 690 \)
\( = 11 \times \frac{690}{23} \)
\( = 11 \times 30 \)
\( = 330 \)
So, the number of females qualified from City-B in 2021 is 330.
Next, let's find the total number of qualified candidates in City-E in 2020. The total qualified candidates in 2020 across all cities is 3800. The distribution percentage for City-E in 2020 is 8%.
Total qualified candidates in City-E in 2020 = 8% of 3800
\( = \frac{8}{100} \times 3800 \)
\( = 8 \times 38 \)
\( = 304 \)
Now, we need to find the number of males among these 304 candidates. The male to female ratio for City-E in 2020 is 5:3. The total parts in the ratio are \(5 + 3 = 8\).
Number of males in City-E in 2020 = (Male ratio part / Total ratio parts) × Total qualified in City-E in 2020
\( = \frac{5}{8} \times 304 \)
\( = 5 \times \frac{304}{8} \)
\( = 5 \times 38 \)
\( = 190 \)
So, the number of males qualified from City-E in 2020 is 190.
We need to find by what percentage the number of females qualified from City-B in 2021 (330) is more than the number of males qualified from City-E in 2020 (190). The formula for percentage increase is:
Percentage Increase \( = \frac{\text{(New Value - Old Value)}}{\text{Old Value}} \times 100 \)
Here, the 'New Value' is the number of females from City-B in 2021 (330), and the 'Old Value' is the number of males from City-E in 2020 (190).
Percentage Increase \( = \frac{(330 - 190)}{190} \times 100 \)
\( = \frac{140}{190} \times 100 \)
\( = \frac{14}{19} \times 100 \)
Let's calculate the value:
\( \frac{14}{19} \approx 0.736842... \)
Percentage Increase \( \approx 0.736842 \times 100 \)
\( \approx 73.6842 \)
The question asks for the approximate percentage. Looking at the options, 73.68 is the closest value.
The number of females qualified from City-B in 2021 is approximately 73.68% more than the number of males qualified from City-E in the year 2020.
| Metric | Calculation | Result |
| Females from City-B (2021) | 15% of 4600 = 690. Females = (11/23) * 690 | 330 |
| Males from City-E (2020) | 8% of 3800 = 304. Males = (5/8) * 304 | 190 |
| Difference | 330 - 190 | 140 |
| Percentage Increase | (140 / 190) * 100 | ~73.68% |
This question is a typical example of data interpretation based on tables, often seen in competitive exams like CET. To solve such problems efficiently, you need to:
These skills are fundamental for solving data interpretation questions quickly and correctly.
The table shows District-wise data of a number of primary school teachers posted in schools of a city.
Study the table and answer the question:
District | Male teachers | Female teachers |
East | 1650 | 2375 |
North | 1075 | 2651 |
West | 1280 | 1520 |
South | 1170 | 1085 |
Central | 690 | 859 |
Table shows income (in Rs. ) received by 4 employees of a company during the month of December 2020 and all their income sources.
Source | Amit | Suresh | Nitin | Varun |
Salary | 35000 | 38500 | 29000 | 42000 |
Arrears | 6000 | 6300 | 5000 | 7500 |
Bonus | 1000 | 1100 | 1000 | 1240 |
Overtime | 1800 | 1950 | 1400 | 1500 |
Study the table and answer the question:
Income (Rs.) | No. of persons |
Less than 200 | 12 |
Less than 250 | 26 |
Less than 300 | 34 |
Less than 350 | 40 |
Less than 400 | 50 |
The following table shows the annual profit of a company (in Rs. lakh).
2014-2015 | 2015-2016 | 2016-0217 | 2017-2018 | 2018-2019 |
625 | 690 | 725 | 775 | 815 |
The period which has the maximum percentage increase in profit over the previous year is:
The table given below shows the number of persons participating in a survey from 6 different states.
| States | Persons |
| S1 | 100 |
| S2 | 200 |
| S3 | 400 |
| S4 | 500 |
| S5 | 600 |
| S6 | 800 |
What is the ratio of number of person participating in a survey from state S3 to the number of person participating in a survey from state S4?