The question asks about the appropriate method for testing a specific hypothesis in a logit model: whether all slope coefficients are simultaneously equal to zero. This is a test of the overall significance of the predictor variables in the model.
The null hypothesis ($H_0$) being tested is:
$$ H_0: \beta_1 = \beta_2 = \dots = \beta_k = 0 $$
Where $\beta_1, \beta_2, \dots, \beta_k$ are the slope coefficients for the $k$ predictor variables in the logit model. If this hypothesis is true, it implies that none of the predictor variables have a statistically significant effect on the outcome variable, even when considered together.
Let's consider the given options:
The Likelihood Ratio (LR) test is the standard statistical procedure used to test the null hypothesis that all slope coefficients in a logit model are simultaneously equal to zero. It effectively compares the overall explanatory power of the model with and without the predictor variables.
| LIST-I | LIST-II | |
| A. One-Tailed Test | I. | Null hypothesis is rejected if the sample value is significantly higher or lower than the hypothesized value of the population parameter |
| B. Paired difference Test | II. | A hypothesis test of the difference between the sample means of two independent samples |
| C. Two-Tailed Test | III. | A sample value significantly above the hypothesized population value will lead to rejection of the null hypothesis |
| D. Upper-Tailed Test | IV. | Concerned only with whether the observed value deviates from the hypothesized value in one direction |