The given statement is followed by some courses of action. Assuming the statement to be true decide the correct option. Statement: There has been a significant drop in the water level in the lakes supplying water to the city.
Statements I and II follow.
Statement Analysis: Significant Drop in City Water Levels
The core issue presented is a "significant drop in the water level" in the city's primary water sources (lakes). This indicates a potential water shortage crisis that requires careful management.
Evaluating Courses of Action
Course of Action I: Partial Supply Cut
Statement: The water supply authority should impose a partial cut in supply to tackle the situation.
Analysis: When water sources are depleted, reducing the overall demand is a logical step. A partial cut, implemented by the authority, is a direct measure to conserve the remaining water and extend its availability. This helps manage the crisis by ensuring supply, albeit reduced, reaches more people for a longer duration.
Conclusion: This action is a reasonable and practical response to the problem.
Course of Action II: Public Appeal for Minimal Use
Statement: The government should appeal to all the residents through mass media for minimal use of water.
Analysis: Encouraging voluntary conservation among residents can significantly reduce overall water consumption. Public awareness campaigns via mass media can inform citizens about the severity of the situation and encourage responsible water usage (e.g., avoiding wastage, shorter showers). This complements supply-side measures.
Conclusion: This action supports conservation efforts and is a sensible approach.
Course of Action III: Ban Supply in Lower Areas
Statement: The government should ban the water supply in lower areas.
Analysis: This action seems arbitrary. There's no inherent reason provided why lower areas specifically should face a complete supply ban. Water shortages typically require equitable distribution or need-based allocation, not bans based on geographical location like elevation without further justification. Such a ban could disproportionately affect residents without addressing the root cause effectively or fairly.
Conclusion: This action is unlikely to be a logical or fair solution and does not directly address the overall water level drop problem effectively.
Conclusion: Following Courses of Action
Based on the analysis, Course of Action I (partial supply cut) and Course of Action II (public appeal for minimal use) are logical and appropriate steps to manage the situation described in the statement. Course of Action III is not a well-reasoned response.
Therefore, statements I and II logically follow from the given statement.
Important Questions from Critical Reasoning
Directions: A statement is given followed by two inferences I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance with commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given inferences, if any, follow from the given statement.
Statement: Many students are addicted to mobile games and this leads to poor academic performance.
Inference:
I. Many Students are not paying attention to studies due to mobile games.
II. It is only because of mobile games that students fail in the examination.
'Little knowledge is a dangerous thing' is a decision based on:
It is better to spend the leftovers after saving. Financial discipline and self-control can make you rich. Saving money after spending is not a good habit. Which among the following statements is true as per the statement?
A. If you spend first then you will be spendy.
B. If you save before spending, you will become rich.
C. If you spend before saving, you will be poor.
D. Saving by borrowing is a bad habit.
Which of the following is the assumption for the claim that 'Pleasure is desirable'?
Read the given statements carefully and answer the questions.
Fear of danger is more dangerous than danger itself. Risk is directly proportional= to danger
Which of the following are true according to the given statements?
A. Fear is worse than any fearful threat.
B. There is a trade-off between risk and danger.
C. There should be fear of danger.
D. There is no need to take risks to overcome any danger.
