The distance between two points measured using 20 m chain was recorded as 327 m. It was found that the chain is 3 cm too long. The true length of the line is
In surveying, accurate measurements are crucial. Often, the measuring instrument, like a chain, might not be its exact nominal length. This discrepancy leads to errors in the recorded measurements, which must be corrected to find the true length of the line being measured.
We are given a scenario where a distance was measured using a 20 m chain. The recorded distance is 327 m. However, it was discovered that the chain was actually 3 cm too long.
We need to determine the true length of the line measured.
The nominal length is 20 m. The chain is 3 cm too long. First, convert the error to meters.
3 cm = $\frac{3}{100}$ m = 0.03 m
The actual length of the chain is the nominal length plus the error:
Actual Length of Chain = Nominal Length + Error
Actual Length of Chain = 20 m + 0.03 m = 20.03 m
When a measurement is taken with a chain that is not the correct length, the true length of the line can be calculated using the following formula:
$\text{True Length} = \left(\frac{\text{Actual Length of Chain}}{\text{Nominal Length of Chain}}\right) \times \text{Measured Length}$
This formula accounts for the difference between the standard length and the actual length of the measuring instrument over the entire measured distance.
Using the formula and the values we have:
Substitute these values into the formula:
$\text{True Length} = \left(\frac{20.03 \text{ m}}{20 \text{ m}}\right) \times 327 \text{ m}$
Calculate the ratio of the actual length to the nominal length:
Ratio = $\frac{20.03}{20} = 1.0015$
Now, multiply this ratio by the measured length:
True Length = $1.0015 \times 327 \text{ m}$
True Length = $327.4905 \text{ m}$
The calculated true length is 327.4905 m. When rounded to two decimal places, this is 327.49 m.
Let's compare this result with the given options:
| Option | Value (m) |
|---|---|
| 1 | 326.55 |
| 2 | 327.49 |
| 3 | 327.55 |
| 4 | 326.49 |
Our calculated true length of 327.49 m matches Option 2.
It makes sense that the true length is greater than the measured length. Since the chain was too long, each application of the chain covered slightly more distance than the nominal 20 m. Therefore, fewer applications of the faulty chain were needed to cover the distance compared to a standard 20 m chain. This results in a measured distance that is less than the actual or true distance.
| Concept | Formula | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Actual Length of Chain | Nominal Length + Error | Error is positive if chain is too long, negative if too short |
| True Length | $\left(\frac{\text{Actual Length}}{\text{Nominal Length}}\right) \times \text{Measured Length}$ | Used for linear measurements (distance) |
| True Area | $\left(\frac{\text{Actual Length}}{\text{Nominal Length}}\right)^2 \times \text{Measured Area}$ | Used for area measurements |
Chain surveying involves various sources of error that surveyors must account for. Errors can be systematic or accidental.
Correcting for incorrect chain length is a fundamental calculation in surveying to ensure the accuracy of measurements and subsequent maps or plans.
When the chain is too long, the measured distance is less than the true distance, so the correction increases the measured length.
When the chain is too short, the measured distance is greater than the true distance, so the correction decreases the measured length.
The formula used, $\text{True Length} = \left(\frac{\text{Actual Length}}{\text{Nominal Length}}\right) \times \text{Measured Length}$, correctly applies this principle by scaling the measured length by the ratio of the actual chain length to its intended length.
Which one is the CORRECT statement?
The method of reciprocal ranging can be used in which of the following cases?
The minimum number of persons required for direct ranging is 2 . Similarly, the number of persons required for indirect ranging is _______.
1 chain is equal to
In a diagonal scale only