The table given below shows the distribution percentage of number of candidates qualifying a Common Entrance Test (CET) in six cities A-F during the year 2020 and 2021, along with the ratio of males (M) to females (F) among the qualified candidates. The total number of qualified candidates in all the six cities together during 2020 and 2021 are 3800 and 4600 respectively. Based on the data in the table, answer the question that follows: City-wise Distribution of CET Qualified Candidates. Year 2020 2021 City (Distribution % of Qualified Candidates) Ratio (Distribution % of Qualified Candidates) Ratio M ∶ F M ∶ F A 13% 8 ∶ 5 24% 5 ∶ 7 B 27% 11 ∶ 8 15% 12 ∶ 11 C 11% 7 ∶ 4 23% 15 ∶ 8 D 20% 2 ∶ 3 17% 8 ∶ 9 E 8% 5 ∶ 3 8% 1 ∶ 3 F 21% 13 ∶ 8 13% 5 ∶ 8
The difference between the number of male candidates qualified from City-B in 2020 and City-A in 2021 is
134
The question asks us to find the difference between the number of male candidates who qualified the Common Entrance Test (CET) from City-B in the year 2020 and from City-A in the year 2021. We are given the total number of qualified candidates across all six cities for each year, the percentage distribution of qualified candidates in each city, and the ratio of male to female qualified candidates for each city and year.
| Year | 2020 | 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Qualified Candidates | 3800 | 4600 | ||
| City | Distribution % (2020) | Ratio M : F (2020) | Distribution % (2021) | Ratio M : F (2021) |
| A | 13% | 8 : 5 | 24% | 5 : 7 |
| B | 27% | 11 : 8 | 15% | 12 : 11 |
| C | 11% | 7 : 4 | 23% | 15 : 8 |
| D | 20% | 2 : 3 | 17% | 8 : 9 |
| E | 8% | 5 : 3 | 8% | 1 : 3 |
| F | 21% | 13 : 8 | 13% | 5 : 8 |
First, let's find the total number of qualified candidates from City-B in 2020. The total number of qualified candidates in 2020 across all cities is 3800. The distribution percentage for City-B in 2020 is 27%.
Total qualified candidates in City-B (2020) = 27% of 3800
\begin{equation*} \text{Total in City-B (2020)} = \frac{27}{100} \times 3800 \end{equation*}
\begin{equation*} \text{Total in City-B (2020)} = 27 \times 38 = 1026 \end{equation*}
Now, we need to find the number of male candidates from City-B in 2020. The ratio of males to females in City-B in 2020 is 11 : 8. The sum of the ratio parts is $11 + 8 = 19$.
Number of male candidates in City-B (2020) = Total qualified in City-B (2020) $\times$ \(\frac{\text{Male ratio part}}{\text{Sum of ratio parts}}\)
\begin{equation*} \text{Males in City-B (2020)} = 1026 \times \frac{11}{19} \end{equation*}
\begin{equation*} \text{Males in City-B (2020)} = 54 \times 11 = 594 \end{equation*}
So, there were 594 male candidates who qualified from City-B in 2020.
Next, let's find the total number of qualified candidates from City-A in 2021. The total number of qualified candidates in 2021 across all cities is 4600. The distribution percentage for City-A in 2021 is 24%.
Total qualified candidates in City-A (2021) = 24% of 4600
\begin{equation*} \text{Total in City-A (2021)} = \frac{24}{100} \times 4600 \end{equation*}
\begin{equation*} \text{Total in City-A (2021)} = 24 \times 46 = 1104 \end{equation*}
Now, we need to find the number of male candidates from City-A in 2021. The ratio of males to females in City-A in 2021 is 5 : 7. The sum of the ratio parts is $5 + 7 = 12$.
Number of male candidates in City-A (2021) = Total qualified in City-A (2021) $\times$ \(\frac{\text{Male ratio part}}{\text{Sum of ratio parts}}\)
\begin{equation*} \text{Males in City-A (2021)} = 1104 \times \frac{5}{12} \end{equation*}
\begin{equation*} \text{Males in City-A (2021)} = 92 \times 5 = 460 \end{equation*}
So, there were 460 male candidates who qualified from City-A in 2021.
The question asks for the difference between the number of male candidates qualified from City-B in 2020 and City-A in 2021.
Difference = Number of male candidates (City-B, 2020) - Number of male candidates (City-A, 2021)
\begin{equation*} \text{Difference} = 594 - 460 \end{equation*}
\begin{equation*} \text{Difference} = 134 \end{equation*}
The difference is 134.
| Metric | City-B (2020) | City-A (2021) |
|---|---|---|
| Total Qualified Candidates (Year) | 3800 | 4600 |
| Distribution Percentage | 27% | 24% |
| Total Qualified in City | 1026 | 1104 |
| Male : Female Ratio | 11 : 8 | 5 : 7 |
| Sum of Ratio Parts | 19 | 12 |
| Number of Male Candidates | 594 | 460 |
Difference = 594 - 460 = 134
Data interpretation questions, like this one involving CET qualified candidates, require careful reading of tables and charts to extract the necessary information. Key steps often include:
Practicing with different types of data representations like tables, bar graphs, pie charts, and line graphs is crucial for improving data interpretation skills for competitive exams.
The table shows District-wise data of a number of primary school teachers posted in schools of a city.
Study the table and answer the question:
District | Male teachers | Female teachers |
East | 1650 | 2375 |
North | 1075 | 2651 |
West | 1280 | 1520 |
South | 1170 | 1085 |
Central | 690 | 859 |
Table shows income (in Rs. ) received by 4 employees of a company during the month of December 2020 and all their income sources.
Source | Amit | Suresh | Nitin | Varun |
Salary | 35000 | 38500 | 29000 | 42000 |
Arrears | 6000 | 6300 | 5000 | 7500 |
Bonus | 1000 | 1100 | 1000 | 1240 |
Overtime | 1800 | 1950 | 1400 | 1500 |
Study the table and answer the question:
Income (Rs.) | No. of persons |
Less than 200 | 12 |
Less than 250 | 26 |
Less than 300 | 34 |
Less than 350 | 40 |
Less than 400 | 50 |
The following table shows the annual profit of a company (in Rs. lakh).
2014-2015 | 2015-2016 | 2016-0217 | 2017-2018 | 2018-2019 |
625 | 690 | 725 | 775 | 815 |
The period which has the maximum percentage increase in profit over the previous year is:
The table given below shows the number of persons participating in a survey from 6 different states.
| States | Persons |
| S1 | 100 |
| S2 | 200 |
| S3 | 400 |
| S4 | 500 |
| S5 | 600 |
| S6 | 800 |
What is the ratio of number of person participating in a survey from state S3 to the number of person participating in a survey from state S4?