Take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Then decide which of the given conclusions logically follow the given statements. Statements: Conclusions:
Both conclusions I and II follow.
This problem requires us to analyze the given statements and determine which of the provided conclusions logically follow from them, assuming the statements are true.
Let's break down each statement:
This conclusion means "No table is a computer." Let's see if this follows from the statements.
If all computers are inside the group of chairs, and the group of chairs has no members in common with the group of tables, then the group of computers can also have no members in common with the group of tables. Think of it like this: If all apples are fruits, and no fruits are vegetables, then no apples can be vegetables.
Therefore, "No computer is a table," which is the same as "Not a single table is a computer," logically follows from the given statements.
Let's evaluate this conclusion based on the statements.
Since the items in set X are tables (from Statement 3), and we know that nothing that is a table can be a chair (from Statement 1), it means the items in set X cannot be chairs.
As X contains some books (from Statement 3), it follows that these specific books (the ones in set X) are not chairs. Therefore, "Some books are not chairs" logically follows from the given statements.
Since both conclusions logically follow from the given statements, the correct option is the one stating that both conclusions I and II follow.
| Statement | Interpretation | Type |
|---|---|---|
| 0% chairs are tables | No chairs are tables (No T are C) | Universal Negative (E) |
| All computers are chairs | All Cm are C | Universal Affirmative (A) |
| Some books are tables | Some B are T | Particular Affirmative (I) |
| Term | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | A proposition given as true for the purpose of the syllogism. | All A are B. |
| Conclusion | A proposition derived logically from the statements. | Therefore, some B are A. |
| Syllogism | A form of logical reasoning where a conclusion is drawn from two or more statements. | Statement 1 + Statement 2 $\implies$ Conclusion. |
| Universal Affirmative (A) | Applies to all members of a category (All X are Y). | All dogs are mammals. |
| Universal Negative (E) | Applies to no members of a category (No X are Y). | No fish are birds. |
| Particular Affirmative (I) | Applies to at least one member of a category (Some X are Y). | Some students are athletes. |
| Particular Negative (O) | Applies to at least one member of a category (Some X are not Y). | Some food is not healthy. |
Syllogisms are a fundamental part of logical reasoning tests. They assess your ability to follow given rules, even if they contradict common knowledge, and derive valid conclusions.
Practicing different types of syllogism questions improves your logical deduction skills, which are important for many exams.
Match List I with List II
| List I | List II |
|---|---|
| A. Jatavas | I. Muslim Community |
| B. Multani Lohars | II. Meghalaya |
| C. Khasis | III. Karnataka |
| D. Vokkaligas | IV. Uttar Pradesh |
Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
Match List I with List II
| List I - Contribution | List II - Important Personalities |
|---|---|
| A. Brahmo Samaj | I. M. G. Ranade |
| B. Widow remarriage | II. Raja Ram Mohan Roy |
| C. Country’s first school for girls | III. Jyotiba Phule |
| D. Anti Caste Movement | IV. Savitri Bai Phule |
Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
Which of the following is not the characteristic of Caste?
The terms ‘Matrilineal’ and ‘Patrilineal’ are associated with:
Indian nationalism is inclusive because it recognises: