Statement (S): Not all rights-based laws lead to equitable outcomes. Explanation (E): Structural inequalities affect access to these rights. Options:
Statement S asserts that "Not all rights-based laws lead to equitable outcomes." This statement is correct. Laws designed to grant rights are intended to promote fairness, but their effectiveness in achieving truly equitable results can be limited in practice.
Explanation E states that "Structural inequalities affect access to these rights." This statement is also correct. Deep-rooted societal issues like poverty, discrimination, and unequal access to resources (structural inequalities) create barriers that prevent many individuals and groups from fully exercising or benefiting from the rights granted by law.
Explanation E directly supports and explains Statement S. The reason why rights-based laws may not lead to equitable outcomes (S) is precisely because structural inequalities (E) impede equal access to those rights. These systemic barriers prevent the laws from achieving their intended fair and just results for everyone.
Both statements S and E are factually correct. Furthermore, Explanation E provides the underlying cause for the situation described in Statement S, making it the correct explanation.
Therefore, the correct option is: Both S and E are correct and E is the correct explanation of S.
Who was the first Deputy Prime Minister of India ?
The Assam State Assembly Election was held recently with newly delimited constituencies. Consider the following statement with respect to this delimitation process.
I. The delimitation was conducted by the Election Commission of India in 2022-23 on the basis of the 2001 census figure.
II. Prior to this, the Constituencies were constituted as per the Delimitation Order of 1976.
III. Section 8A of the Representation People's Act, 1950 provides for special provision for delimitation for Assembly Constituencies of Assam, Manipur, Nagaland and Arunachal Pradesh.
IV. SC assembly seats have increased from 8 to 9 and ST assembly seats have increased from 16 to 19.
How many of the above statement(s) is/are true?
Consider the following statements with respect to privileges of members of Parliament.
I. Privileges would not be fettered by Art. 19 (1) (a) of Indian Constitution.
II. Privileges must be read subject to the Articles 20 - 22 and Art. 32 of the Constitution
III. Immunity is available in relation to both Civil and Criminal prosecution
IV. Immunity is available in relation to Freedom of Speech even in his/her private or personal capacity
How many of the above statement(s) is/are true?