Indian Constitution Doctrine of Estoppel Explained
The 'Doctrine of Estoppel' is a legal principle. It prevents a person from asserting a fact that is contrary to a position they previously took, either through words or actions.
Estoppel in Indian Constitution Context
The Indian Constitution does not explicitly mention the 'Doctrine of Estoppel' in any specific Article.
This doctrine is primarily a rule of evidence, originating from English common law. It is applied in India through the interpretation and application of laws by the courts, rather than being enshrined in a specific constitutional provision.
Analysis of Constitution Articles Mentioned
The Articles provided in the options relate to different subjects:
- Article 115 concerns procedure relating to certain estimates.
- Article 117 deals with previous sanctions required for certain types of bills.
- Article 123 grants the President the power to promulgate Ordinances during recess of Parliament.
These Articles do not cover principles of evidence like estoppel.
Conclusion on Estoppel's Constitutional Article
As the 'Doctrine of Estoppel' is not codified in a specific Article of the Indian Constitution, the correct conclusion is that it is not found within any single Article.
Important Questions from Indian Polity (State PSC)
Who was the first Deputy Prime Minister of India ?
- Which of the following correctly explains the significance of PESA, 1996 in Jharkhand?
The Assam State Assembly Election was held recently with newly delimited constituencies. Consider the following statement with respect to this delimitation process.
I. The delimitation was conducted by the Election Commission of India in 2022-23 on the basis of the 2001 census figure.
II. Prior to this, the Constituencies were constituted as per the Delimitation Order of 1976.
III. Section 8A of the Representation People's Act, 1950 provides for special provision for delimitation for Assembly Constituencies of Assam, Manipur, Nagaland and Arunachal Pradesh.
IV. SC assembly seats have increased from 8 to 9 and ST assembly seats have increased from 16 to 19.
How many of the above statement(s) is/are true?
Consider the following statements with respect to privileges of members of Parliament.
I. Privileges would not be fettered by Art. 19 (1) (a) of Indian Constitution.
II. Privileges must be read subject to the Articles 20 - 22 and Art. 32 of the Constitution
III. Immunity is available in relation to both Civil and Criminal prosecution
IV. Immunity is available in relation to Freedom of Speech even in his/her private or personal capacity
How many of the above statement(s) is/are true?
Consider the following statements with respect to doctrine of "procedure established by law" as provided in the Constitution of India.
I. It protects against executive action.
II. It protects against legislative action.
III. Article 22 was incorporated to the Constitution as additional safeguards after debate in the Constituent Assembly.
IV. In the Bank Nationalisation Case, the Supreme Court adopted its strict interpretation.
How many of the above statement(s) is/are correct?
