Select the most appropriate option that can substitute the underlined segment in the given sentence. If there is no need to substitute it, select ‘No substitution required’. If he works harder, he g ot better results.
will get
The question asks us to identify the most appropriate substitution for the underlined segment "g ot better results" in the sentence "If he works harder, he got better results." This involves understanding the correct grammatical structure, specifically focusing on conditional sentences.
The sentence "If he works harder, he got better results" uses an 'if' clause followed by a main clause. The 'if' clause "If he works harder" uses the present simple tense ("works"). The main clause "he got better results" uses the simple past tense ("got").
This structure (If + present simple, simple past) is not the standard structure for discussing likely future outcomes based on a present or future condition. It suggests a mix of conditional types or a grammatical error.
Conditional sentences often describe a condition and its result. The most common type used for real or likely future events based on a present or future condition is the Type 1 conditional.
Comparing the original sentence structure with the Type 1 conditional structure, we see that the 'if' clause ("If he works harder") matches the Type 1 structure (present simple). However, the main clause ("he got better results") uses the simple past, not "will + base verb". Therefore, the original sentence does not follow the standard Type 1 conditional structure for likely future results.
Let's examine each option to see which one provides the correct main clause structure given the 'if' clause "If he works harder".
was getting
Substituting "was getting" gives: "If he works harder, he was getting better results." This uses the past continuous tense. This structure (If + present simple, past continuous) is not a standard conditional form for discussing future outcomes. It doesn't logically follow the intended meaning of a condition leading to a future result.
is getting
Substituting "is getting" gives: "If he works harder, he is getting better results." This uses the present continuous tense. While 'is getting' can sometimes indicate a result happening now due to a continuous condition, it doesn't fit the typical Type 1 conditional structure predicting a future result based on a future or present condition ("works harder").
No substitution required
As discussed, the original sentence "If he works harder, he got better results" mixes tenses incorrectly for a common conditional structure discussing likely future results. The simple past "got" in the main clause is not appropriate after the present simple "works" in the 'if' clause when talking about a probable future result. Therefore, a substitution is required.
will get
Substituting "will get" gives: "If he works harder, he will get better results." This sentence follows the standard Type 1 conditional structure (If + present simple, will + base verb). It correctly expresses a likely future outcome ("he will get better results") that depends on a possible present or future condition ("If he works harder"). This is the most appropriate structure for the intended meaning of the sentence.
Based on the analysis of conditional sentence structures, particularly Type 1, the phrase "will get" correctly completes the sentence to express a probable future result based on a present or future condition. The original phrasing "got better results" is grammatically incorrect in this context.
The most appropriate substitution is "will get".
| Original Sentence Segment | Substitution Option | Resulting Sentence | Grammatically Correct? | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| got better results | was getting | If he works harder, he was getting better results. | No | Incorrect conditional structure. |
| got better results | is getting | If he works harder, he is getting better results. | No | Does not fit standard Type 1 conditional for future result. |
| got better results | No substitution required | If he works harder, he got better results. | No | Incorrect tense mix for probable future result. |
| got better results | will get | If he works harder, he will get better results. | Yes | Follows standard Type 1 conditional structure. |
Therefore, the segment "g ot better results" should be substituted with "will get".
Review key grammar concepts related to this question.
Beyond Type 1, there are other types of conditional sentences in English:
Understanding these different types helps in choosing the correct verb tenses for various conditional situations.
Select the most appropriate option to substitute the underlined segment in the given sentence. If there is no need to substitute it, select No improvement.
The Constitution of India was prepared after a thorough study of constitutions of various countries.
Select the most appropriate option that can substitute the underlined segment in the given sentence. If there is no need to substitute it, select ‘No substitution required’.
Kolkata is a capital of the Indian state of West Bengal.
Select the option that will improve the underlined part of the given sentence. In case no improvement is needed, select 'No improvement required'.
Try harder, don’t give away so easily.
Select the most appropriate option that can substitute the underlined segment in the given sentence. If there is no need to substitute it, select ‘No substitution required’.
Your decision to stay home this weekend is more better than mine to go out for dinner.
Select the most appropriate option that can substitute the underlined segment in the given sentence. If there is no need to substitute it, select ‘No substitution required’.
Last Sunday I returning home late at night.