The question describes a scenario where an Environmental Studies (EVS) teacher, Roshni, presents her students with a data chart. This chart shows the germination success rates of different types of seeds (mustard, green gram, Bengal gram, and chilli) out of a total of 20 seeds for each type. The teacher then prompts the students to explain the reasons behind the observed differences, or variations, in how well these seeds germinated.
Roshni's goal is to evaluate a specific skill her students possess. By asking them to explain the variation in germination rates based on the provided data, she is assessing their ability to:
This process requires more than just guessing or stating facts; it involves a systematic approach to understanding a phenomenon.
Let's look at why certain skills are more or less suitable in this context:
The teacher wants students to delve into the 'why' behind the differing seed germination results. This requires them to examine the data, consider possible reasons, and build an explanation. This comprehensive process of inquiry and explanation-seeking is best described as the skill of investigation. Therefore, Roshni aims to assess the students' skill in investigation.
Match List – I with List – II.
| List – I | List – II |
| I. Projective Test | A. BSID |
| II. Intelligence test for adults | B. WISC-III |
| III. Intelligence test for children | C. APGAR |
| IV. Infant scales | D. WAIS |
| V. New born assessment | E. CLAT |
| F. TAT |
Codes :
In CLT, the teacher evaluates student's :
(a) Errors
(b) Vocabulary
(c) Fluency
(d) Structure
(e) Performance informally as co-communication.
Choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below :