Assertion (A) : According to the exponents of Monism Theory, law is a Unified branch of knowledge, no matter whether it applies on persons or other entities.
Reason (R) : In view of the Monistic writers, in the ultimate analysis of the law we find that man is at the root to all laws.
Assertion (A) states that exponents of Monism Theory view law as a single, unified body of knowledge, applicable universally whether to individuals or other entities. This aligns with the core idea of monism, which posits unity or a single source. Therefore, Assertion (A) is considered correct.
Reason (R) suggests that Monistic writers believe 'man' is the fundamental origin ('root') of all laws. This points to an anthropocentric source for law, which is a common perspective in many legal theories that seek a singular foundation for legal rules, such as those derived from human will or reason. Therefore, Reason (R) is also considered correct.
While both statements (A) and (R) reflect valid aspects potentially associated with Monism Theory in legal thought, Reason (R) does not directly explain *why* law is considered a unified branch of knowledge as stated in Assertion (A). The unity of law (A) might stem from its systematic construction, a single sovereign source (like in legal positivism), or a universal ethical principle, rather than solely from 'man' being its root (R). Therefore, (R) is not the correct explanation for (A).
Based on the analysis:
This matches Option B.
| LIST-I Maxim | LIST-II Meaning |
|---|---|
| A. Erga Omnes | I. Relation to all |
| B. Jus Cogens | II. Peremptory norm |
| C. Pacta Sunt Servanda | III. Agreements are to be respected |
| D. Rebus Sic Stantibus | IV. Essential circumstances remain unchanged |