Assertion (A) : According to the exponents of Monism Theory, law is a Unified branch of knowledge, no matter whether it applies on persons or other entities.
Reason (R) : In view of the Monistic writers, in the ultimate analysis of the law we find that man is at the root to all laws.
Monism Theory: Assertion Analysis
Assertion (A) states that exponents of Monism Theory view law as a single, unified body of knowledge, applicable universally whether to individuals or other entities. This aligns with the core idea of monism, which posits unity or a single source. Therefore, Assertion (A) is considered correct.
Monism Theory: Reason Analysis
Reason (R) suggests that Monistic writers believe 'man' is the fundamental origin ('root') of all laws. This points to an anthropocentric source for law, which is a common perspective in many legal theories that seek a singular foundation for legal rules, such as those derived from human will or reason. Therefore, Reason (R) is also considered correct.
Relationship Between Assertion and Reason
While both statements (A) and (R) reflect valid aspects potentially associated with Monism Theory in legal thought, Reason (R) does not directly explain *why* law is considered a unified branch of knowledge as stated in Assertion (A). The unity of law (A) might stem from its systematic construction, a single sovereign source (like in legal positivism), or a universal ethical principle, rather than solely from 'man' being its root (R). Therefore, (R) is not the correct explanation for (A).
Conclusion
Based on the analysis:
- Assertion (A) is correct.
- Reason (R) is correct.
- Reason (R) does not correctly explain Assertion (A).
This matches Option B.
Important Questions from Public International Law
- Assertion (A) : Ratifying international conventions has impacted legislations, policies and programmes for women and children.
Reason (R) : Non-compliance with the article in the conventions leads to punitive measures against the transgressing state.
Select the most suitable option : - "The Law of nations is that collection of usages which civilized states have agreed to observe in their dealings with one another". This definition of International law is given by Lord Coleridge"-in :
- In which of the following cases it was held that "there is no distinction between defacto and dejure recognition for the purpose of giving effect to the international acts of the recognised authority"?
- Mention the following decisions in a chronological order on Extradition :
(a) Mubarak Ali Ahmed V State of Bombay
(b) Hans Muller of Nurremberg V Suptt. Presidency Jail Calcutta and Others
(c) Ram Babu Saxena V State
(d) State of Madras V C.G. Menon
Choose the correct option : - Given below are two statements – one is labelled as Assertion (A) and the other is labelled as Reason (R)
Assertion (A) : Subject to rules of Jus cogens local customary law can supplement or derogate from general custom
Reasons (R) : International law does not recognise the concept of local custom
In the light of the above two statements choose the correct option
