All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

Assertion (A) : Ratifying international conventions has impacted legislations, policies and programmes for women and children.
Reason (R) : Non-compliance with the article in the conventions leads to punitive measures against the transgressing state.
Select the most suitable option :

The correct answer is
(A) is correct and (R) is incorrect

Assertion (A) Analysis

Assertion (A) states that ratifying international conventions has impacted legislations, policies, and programmes for women and children. When a country ratifies international conventions (like CEDAW or the Convention on the Rights of the Child), it commits to upholding the principles within them. This commitment typically necessitates changes in national laws, policy frameworks, and governmental programs to align with the convention's standards. Therefore, Assertion (A) is considered correct.

Reason (R) Analysis

Reason (R) suggests that non-compliance with articles in these conventions leads to punitive measures against the state. While international conventions establish obligations and often involve monitoring mechanisms (e.g., reporting, review committees), direct punitive measures (like sanctions or fines imposed by an international body) are not a standard or common consequence for non-compliance across most human rights and social conventions. Consequences are usually diplomatic pressure, international criticism, recommendations for improvement, or reputational damage, rather than strict legal punishment. Therefore, Reason (R) is considered incorrect.

Conclusion

Based on the analysis:

  • Assertion (A) is correct.
  • Reason (R) is incorrect.

The most suitable option is that (A) is correct and (R) is incorrect.

Was this answer helpful?

Important Questions from Public International Law

  1. "The Law of nations is that collection of usages which civilized states have agreed to observe in their dealings with one another". This definition of International law is given by Lord Coleridge"-in :
  2. In which of the following cases it was held that "there is no distinction between defacto and dejure recognition for the purpose of giving effect to the international acts of the recognised authority"?
  3. Mention the following decisions in a chronological order on Extradition :

    (a) Mubarak Ali Ahmed V State of Bombay
    (b) Hans Muller of Nurremberg V Suptt. Presidency Jail Calcutta and Others
    (c) Ram Babu Saxena V State
    (d) State of Madras V C.G. Menon

    Choose the correct option :
  4. Given below are two statements – one is labelled as Assertion (A) and the other is labelled as Reason (R)

    Assertion (A) : Subject to rules of Jus cogens local customary law can supplement or derogate from general custom
    Reasons (R) : International law does not recognise the concept of local custom

    In the light of the above two statements choose the correct option
  5. Who of the following has remarked that International law is a "Living and Expanding Code"?
Need Expert Advice?

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App