Assertion (A): The rule making power of the Supreme Court of India is not subject to any law made by the Parliament.
Reason (R) : Only an impartial and independent judiciary can protect the rights of Individual without fear or favour.
Assertion (A) states that the rule-making power of the Supreme Court of India is not subject to any law made by the Parliament.
This statement is False. While Article 145 of the Constitution empowers the Supreme Court to make rules for its practice and procedure, subject to the President's approval, these rules are not entirely free from parliamentary oversight. Parliament can enact laws concerning the Supreme Court, including aspects of its procedure, as long as they are consistent with the Constitution. For instance, parliamentary acts can influence the Court's functioning and procedural aspects.
Reason (R) states that only an impartial and independent judiciary can protect the rights of individuals without fear or favour.
This statement is True. Judicial independence and impartiality are fundamental principles of the rule of law. An independent judiciary is essential to safeguard citizens' fundamental rights and ensure justice is administered fairly, acting as a crucial check on the powers of the executive and legislature.
Based on the analysis:
Therefore, the correct option is the one stating that (A) is false and (R) is true.
Who appoints the judges of the Supreme Court?
If a question arises about the age of a Judge of a High Court, who will decide about this matter?
How Supreme Court protects the Supremacy of the Constitution ?
i. By due process of law
ii. By procedure established by law
In the context of judicial Review what is a duty of Supreme Court:
In a federal system why a Judiciary is essential ?
a. To enterprete the Constitution
b. To protect the Fundamental Rights
c. To protect the Supremacy of the Constitution
d. To protect Democratic system
e. To settle disputes between centre and states
f. To protect parliamentary system