The question asks which statement accurately describes the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of India. Original jurisdiction refers to the power of a court to hear a case for the first time, as opposed to appellate jurisdiction, where the court hears appeals from lower courts.
In India, the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction is primarily defined by Article 131 of the Constitution. This jurisdiction allows the Supreme Court to directly hear certain types of disputes without them going through lower courts first. These specific disputes are:
It's important to note that this jurisdiction does not cover disputes involving private individuals or entities, unless they also involve the specific inter-governmental or state-vs-state nature described above.
Let's examine each option in the context of the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction:
Based on the constitutional provisions, specifically Article 131, the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction is directly invoked for resolving disputes between the Union and the states. Therefore, the statement 'It settles disputes between the Union and states' is true regarding the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of India.
Who appoints the judges of the Supreme Court?
If a question arises about the age of a Judge of a High Court, who will decide about this matter?
How Supreme Court protects the Supremacy of the Constitution ?
i. By due process of law
ii. By procedure established by law
In the context of judicial Review what is a duty of Supreme Court:
In a federal system why a Judiciary is essential ?
a. To enterprete the Constitution
b. To protect the Fundamental Rights
c. To protect the Supremacy of the Constitution
d. To protect Democratic system
e. To settle disputes between centre and states
f. To protect parliamentary system