Assertion (A) : In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, no one shall be subjected only for such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others, and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order, and the general welfare in a democratic society.
Reason (R) : Because Article 29(2) of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states so.
Codes:
Assertion (A) Evaluation
The question requires evaluating the correctness of a given Assertion (A) and Reason (R) concerning the limitations on exercising rights and freedoms, specifically referencing Article 29(2) of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR).
Assertion (A) Accuracy
Assertion (A): "In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, no one shall be subjected only for such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others, and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order, and the general welfare in a democratic society."
Assertion (A) is determined to be incorrect.
Reasoning: The assertion's wording, specifically "subjected only for such limitations," is imprecise and deviates from the exact phrasing of UDHR Article 29(2). The UDHR states: "everyone shall be subject only to such limitations". The difference is crucial: "subject only to" precisely defines the *exclusive category* of permissible limitations, whereas "subjected only for" potentially misrepresents the scope and nature of these restrictions, focusing ambiguously on the *purpose* rather than the *type* of limitation. This inaccurate phrasing renders the assertion wrong.
Reason (R) Accuracy
Reason (R): "Because Article 29(2) of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states so."
Reason (R) is determined to be incorrect.
Reasoning: Reason (R) claims that UDHR Article 29(2) supports or states Assertion (A). As Assertion (A) is an inaccurate restatement of the article's precise wording and meaning, the claim that UDHR Article 29(2) "states so" is false. The article does not affirm the assertion in its flawed form.
Conclusion on Rights Limitations
Based on the analysis, both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are incorrect. This aligns with the option stating that both are wrong.
Important Questions from Human Rights Law
- "Human dignity is the Quintessence of Human Rights" This has been stated by
- The concept of Universalism is based on
(a) Natural Theory
(b) Theory of Rationalism
(c) Theory of Positivism
(d) Theory of Cultural Relativism
Choose the most appropriate option : - Which of the following is the composition of the International Bill of Human Rights?
(a) Universal Declaration of Human Rights
(b) International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights
(c) The International Covenant of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
(d) The Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Choose the most appropriate option: Various legislations relating to Human Rights in India are given below. Arrange them in chronological order since 1955
- Which of the following statement is wrong? Answer using codes given below :
(a) Human Rights are essentially a product of bureaucracy.
(b) Human Rights are a reaction to tyranny
(c) Primitive man could move all over world, without any restriction
(d) All women are born free, but everywhere they are in chains.
Codes:
