Rajan was not happy that Sajan decided to do the project on his own. On observing his unhappiness, Sajan explained to Rajan that he preferred to work independently. Which one of the statements below is logically valid and can be inferred from the above sentences?
Rajan had believed that Sajan and he would be working together.
The question asks us to identify a statement that is logically valid and can be inferred from the given sentences about Rajan and Sajan's project work.
Project Collaboration Inference
In this scenario, Rajan expresses unhappiness because Sajan chose to undertake the project independently. Sajan then clarifies his preference for working alone. We need to determine which of the provided statements is a sound logical inference from these observations about Rajan and Sajan's project.
Understanding Rajan's Unhappiness
Rajan's reaction is crucial for understanding the situation. He was "not happy that Sajan decided to do the project on his own." This strong emotional response from Rajan suggests that his expectation or desire was different from Sajan's independent action. If Rajan was unhappy about Sajan working alone on the project, it implies that he expected or wanted Sajan not to work alone, but rather to work with him on the project. This is a key piece of information for making a logical inference.
Analyzing Logical Validity of Statements
Let's examine each option provided to determine its logical validity based on the information given about Rajan and Sajan's project and their preferences.
Option 1: Rajan's Group Preference
- The statement says, "Rajan has decided to work only in a group."
- While Rajan was unhappy about Sajan working alone, implying he wanted to work with Sajan on this specific project, the text does not provide enough information to infer that Rajan only works in a group in general. His unhappiness is specific to Sajan's choice for this particular project, not a broader declaration about his entire work preference. Therefore, this statement is too broad and cannot be logically inferred from the sentences.
Option 2: Group Formation Wishes
- The statement says, "Rajan and Sajan were formed into a group against their wishes."
- The text explicitly states Sajan "preferred to work independently," which clearly means he did not wish to work in a group for the project. However, Rajan's unhappiness stems from Sajan working alone, indicating Rajan likely did wish to work with Sajan on the project. Since Rajan's wishes were seemingly aligned with working together, the statement that it was "against their wishes" (plural) is incorrect. Thus, this statement is not logically valid.
Option 3: Sajan's Decision to Work Together
- The statement says, "Sajan had decided to give in to Rajan’s request to work with him."
- This directly contradicts the very first sentence of the passage, which states, "Sajan decided to do the project on his own." Furthermore, Sajan explicitly explained "he preferred to work independently." There is no indication that Sajan gave in to any request to work with Rajan; in fact, the opposite is true – he chose to work alone. Therefore, this statement is factually incorrect based on the passage and cannot be inferred.
Option 4: Rajan's Belief in Collaboration
- The statement says, "Rajan had believed that Sajan and he would be working together."
- Rajan's unhappiness ("Rajan was not happy") directly results from Sajan's decision "to do the project on his own." For Rajan to be unhappy about Sajan working alone, it logically implies that Rajan had a prior expectation or belief that they would indeed be collaborating on the project. If Rajan had no such belief or expectation, Sajan's independent work would not cause him unhappiness in this context. This statement perfectly explains Rajan's reaction and is a strong, logical inference from the given sentences regarding their project collaboration.
Conclusion on Project Inference
Based on the detailed analysis of each statement against the provided text, the most logically valid inference is that Rajan had a prior expectation or belief of working together with Sajan on the project. Rajan's unhappiness serves as direct evidence of this unfulfilled expectation regarding their project collaboration.
Important Questions from Verbal Deduction
Lamenting the gradual sidelining of the arts in school curricula, a goup of prominent artists wrote to the Chief Minister last year, asking him to allocate more funds to support arts education in schools. However, no such increase has been announced in this year`s Budget. The artists expressed their deep anguish at their request not being approved, but many of them remain optimistic about funding in the future.
Which of the statement(s) below is/are logically valid and can be inferred from the above statements?
(i) The artists expected funding for the arts to increase this year.
(ii) The Chief Minister was receptive to the idea of increasing funding for the arts.
(iii) The Chief Minister is a prominent artist.
(iv) Schools are giving less importance to arts education nowadays,Read the following paragraph and choose the correct statement.
Climate change has reduced human security and threatened human wellbeing. An ignored reality of human progress is that human security largely depends upon environmental security. But on the contrary, human progress seems contradictory to environmental security. To keep up both at the required level is a challenge to be addressed by one and all. One of the ways to curb the climate change may be suitable scientific innovations, while the other may be the Gandhian perspective on
Small scale progress with focus on sustainability.Choose the most appropriate phrase from the options given below to complete the following sentence.
The aircraft_______ take off as soon as its flight plan was filed.
Once the team of analysts identifies the problem, we _________ in a better position to comment on the issue.
Which one of the following choices CANNOT fill the given blank?“If you are looking for a history of India, or for an account of the rise and fall of the British Raj, or for the reason of the cleaving the subcontinent into two mutually antagonistic parts and the effects this mutilation will have in the respective sections, and ultimately on Asia, you will to find it in these pages; for though I have spent a lifetime in the country, I lived too near the seat of events, and was too intimately associated with the actors, to get the perspective needed for the impartial recording of these matters.”
Which of the following is closest in meaning to ‘cleaving’?
