Match List - I with List - II :List - I
(Figures of Categorical Syllogism)List - II
(Structure)A. First I. M-P, S-M $\rightarrow$ S-P B. Second II. P-M, S-M $\rightarrow$ S-P C. Third III. M-P, M-S $\rightarrow$ S-P D. Fourth IV. P-M, M-S $\rightarrow$ S-P
Choose the correct answer from the options given below :
This question requires matching the four figures of a categorical syllogism with their respective structural representations. A categorical syllogism is a deductive argument consisting of three parts: a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion. Each part contains a categorical proposition. The key to identifying the figure is the position of the middle term (M) in the premises. The major term is denoted by 'P' and the minor term by 'S'. The conclusion always has the structure S-P.
In the First Figure, the middle term (M) is the subject of the major premise and the predicate of the minor premise.
In the Second Figure, the middle term (M) is the predicate of both the major and minor premises.
In the Third Figure, the middle term (M) is the subject of both the major and minor premises.
In the Fourth Figure, the middle term (M) is the predicate of the major premise and the subject of the minor premise.
Based on the analysis of each figure:
Therefore, the correct matching is A-I, B-II, C-III, D-IV.
The correct option that accurately matches List - I with List - II is:
A-I, B-II, C-III, D-IV
Which of the following propositions are logically equivalent to 'No women are dishonest human beings':
(A) No dishonest human beings are women
(B) All women are non-dishonest human beings
(C) No women are non-dishonest human beings
(D) All non women are non dishonest
Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
Which of the following propositions are logically equivalent?
A. No women are arrogant human beings.
B. No arrogant human beings are women.
C. All women are non-arrogant human beings.
D. All non-arrogant human beings are non-women.
Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
Which one of the following propositions is logically equivalent to the proposition-"Some attorneys are logicians"?