Matching Supreme Court Cases with Legal Principles

This section details the matching of landmark Supreme Court case laws with their corresponding legal principles:

• Canara Bank Vs. V.K. Awasthy (2005) is linked to (ii) Post decisional hearing. This principle allows for a hearing after an initial decision is made, especially in certain administrative contexts.
• Gullapalli Nageswara Rao Vs. A.P. State Road Transport Corporation, 1959 established the principle that (iv) One who decides must hear. This emphasizes the core tenet of natural justice that the adjudicator must hear the parties.
• Swadeshi Cotton Mills Vs. Union of India (1981) relates to the principle concerning the (iii) Exclusion of rule of hearing. The case examined the conditions under which the right to a hearing might be excluded and the implications of such exclusion.
• A.K. Kraipak Vs. Union of India (1970) affirmed the (i) Duty to act fairly in administrative functions. This case significantly broadened the application of natural justice principles to administrative actions.

The correct code representing this match is (a)-(ii), (b)-(iv), (c)-(iii), (d)-(i).