Constitutional Duties Landmark Case Matching

This section matches statements concerning constitutional rights and duties with significant Indian legal cases from List-II.

Case Match Explanations

• Statement (a): To renounce practices derogatory to the dignity of women.
  Matched Case: (ii) Union of India Vs. Naveen Jindal.
  (Note: This pairing reflects the provided correct answer.)
• Statement (b): Mandamus cannot be sought against an individual who does not observe a fundamental duty.
  Matched Case: (i) Surya Narain Choudhary Vs. Union of India.
  (Note: This pairing reflects the provided correct answer.)
• Statement (c): Respect to National Anthem.
  Matched Case: (iii) Bijoe Emmanuel Vs. State of Kerala.
  Reasoning: In this key case, the Supreme Court ruled that standing respectfully during the National Anthem was sufficient, aligning with freedom of expression principles.
• Statement (d): Respect and dignity to National Flag.
  Matched Case: (iv) Union of India Vs. Naveen Jindal.
  Reasoning: This landmark judgment affirmed citizens' fundamental right to display the National Flag, connecting it to freedom of speech and expression.

Correct Code Selection

The correct code, derived from the established matches, is:

(a)-(ii), (b)-(i), (c)-(iii), (d)-(iv)