All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

Malik Ambar brought revolutionary changes in the agrarian and revenue structure of the Nizam Shahi kingdom. In this context which of the following provisions are correct ?

(A) Malik Ambar abolished the farming of land revenue collection

(B) He initiated a system of glance-survey (nazar-pahani)

(C) Under nazar-pahani land was divided into baghat and nabud

(D) The maximum rate of land revenue was decide between 1/4 and 2/3 of the produce on different classes of soil

Choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below:

The correct answer is

(A), (B) and (D) only

Understanding Malik Ambar's Agrarian Reforms in Nizam Shahi Kingdom

Malik Ambar, the regent of the Nizam Shahi Sultanate of Ahmednagar, is renowned for his administrative acumen, particularly his significant reforms in the land revenue system. These changes aimed to improve the state's finances while also providing some relief and certainty to the cultivators. Let's examine the specific provisions mentioned in the question to understand their accuracy in the context of Malik Ambar's reforms.

Analyzing the Provisions of Malik Ambar's Reforms

We will now analyze each statement regarding Malik Ambar's agrarian and revenue structure changes:

  • (A) Malik Ambar abolished the farming of land revenue collection

    Land revenue farming, or 'ijaradari', involved contracting out the right to collect revenue from a specific area to intermediaries (farmers) who would pay a fixed sum to the state and keep the rest. This system often led to excessive demands and exploitation of peasants by the farmers. Malik Ambar's reform aimed to move away from this system towards a more direct assessment and collection, similar to the system implemented by Todar Mal in the Mughal Empire. Abolishing revenue farming was a key feature of his reforms to ensure a more equitable collection and prevent exploitation. This statement is historically considered correct.

  • (B) He initiated a system of glance-survey (nazar-pahani)

    Malik Ambar introduced methods for assessing land and its productivity to determine the revenue demand. While his system evolved, initial assessments or those for certain areas might have involved a summary or 'glance survey' (nazar-pahani) to get a rough estimate of the potential produce before more detailed measurements and assessments were possible or implemented widely. This method served as a practical way to initiate the assessment process across the kingdom. This statement aligns with historical accounts describing his initial survey methods.

  • (C) Under nazar-pahani land was divided into baghat and nabud

    The terms 'baghat' generally refers to garden or irrigated land, often highly productive, while 'nabud' typically signifies ruined, waste, or uncultivated land. While Malik Ambar's system did involve land classification based on fertility and crop type to fix revenue rates, the statement that 'nazar-pahani' specifically and solely involved dividing land into just 'baghat' and 'nabud' is not entirely accurate or a complete description of his classification system. His system likely involved more nuanced categories based on productivity, similar to classification systems elsewhere in India at the time. Therefore, linking 'nazar-pahani' specifically to only these two divisions is questionable.

  • (D) The maximum rate of land revenue was decide between 1/4 and 2/3 of the produce on different classes of soil

    Malik Ambar's revenue system aimed to fix the state's demand as a share of the actual produce or its value. The rates were not uniform but varied based on the fertility of the soil, the type of crop grown, and irrigation facilities. Historical accounts suggest that revenue rates under his system could range significantly, from around one-fourth to as high as two-fifths or even more on the most fertile lands. A range between 1/4 and 2/3 covers the variability in potential rates across different soil classes and productivity levels under his system, representing the state's share. This statement reflects the varying rates applied based on land quality.

Synthesizing the Correct Provisions

Based on the analysis:

  • Statement (A) is correct as he abolished revenue farming.
  • Statement (B) is correct as he initiated a form of glance-survey or preliminary assessment.
  • Statement (C) is likely incorrect or an oversimplification regarding land division under nazar-pahani.
  • Statement (D) is correct as revenue rates varied significantly based on land classification, falling within a broad historical range that could include 1/4 to 2/3 on different soil types.

Therefore, the correct provisions are (A), (B), and (D).

Conclusion on Malik Ambar's Reforms

Malik Ambar's reforms were pivotal in improving the administration and revenue collection in the Nizam Shahi kingdom. By abolishing revenue farming and implementing a more structured assessment system, initially perhaps involving glance-surveys and subsequently more detailed methods, he aimed for a more stable and less exploitative revenue system. The variable revenue rates based on soil productivity were a rational approach to land taxation at the time.

The provisions that accurately describe his reforms are (A), (B), and (D).

Analysis of Malik Ambar's Revenue Reform Statements
Statement Provision Description Accuracy Reasoning
(A) Abolished farming of land revenue collection Correct Key reform to reduce exploitation and ensure direct collection.
(B) Initiated system of glance-survey (nazar-pahani) Correct Used as a preliminary or initial method of assessment.
(C) Under nazar-pahani land divided into baghat and nabud Incorrect Oversimplifies land classification under nazar-pahani; terms more general.
(D) Maximum revenue rate 1/4 to 2/3 of produce Correct Reflects variable rates based on soil productivity across different classes.

Revision Table: Key Aspects of Malik Ambar's Administration

Key Features of Malik Ambar's Reforms
Area of Reform Specific Measures Impact
Revenue System Abolition of Revenue Farming, Introduction of Assessment System (similar to Todar Mal), Variable rates based on soil. Increased state revenue, Reduced peasant exploitation (compared to farming), More systematic collection.
Military Development of Maratha cavalry, Guerilla warfare tactics. Effective resistance against Mughal expansion.
Administration Stability in the kingdom, Promotion of local talent. Strengthened the Nizam Shahi state against external threats.

Additional Information: Context of Deccan Sultanates Revenue Systems

The Deccan Sultanates, including the Nizam Shahi kingdom, developed sophisticated administrative systems, often drawing inspiration from or interacting with systems in North India, particularly under the Delhi Sultanate and later the Mughal Empire. Land revenue was the primary source of income for these states.

  • Types of Assessment: Systems included crop-sharing (batai or ghalla-bakhshi), measurement-based assessment (zabt), and aggregate assessment or collection farming (ijaradari).
  • Malik Ambar's Influence: His reforms in Ahmednagar were particularly influential. He implemented a system often compared to Todar Mal's zabt system, emphasizing measurement and assessment based on average produce over several years, calculated per unit area. This aimed for a more predictable revenue for the state and cultivators.
  • Variability in Rates: Revenue rates were rarely uniform across a kingdom. They depended heavily on factors like soil fertility, availability of irrigation, rainfall, and the type of crop (e.g., cash crops vs. food grains). Rates commonly ranged from one-third to one-half of the produce, but could be higher or lower depending on circumstances.
  • Purpose of Reforms: Reforms like Malik Ambar's were crucial for consolidating state power, ensuring consistent revenue flow, and sometimes, as a measure to gain the loyalty of the peasantry by providing a more just system compared to the abuses of revenue farmers.

Malik Ambar's efforts significantly strengthened the Nizam Shahi state, enabling it to resist Mughal expansion for a considerable period.

Was this answer helpful?

Important Questions from Administration & Economy

  1. Which of the following statements regarding Malik Ambar are correct:

    (A). Malik Ambar was sold at Ahmadnagar to chingiz khan, the minister of Murtaza Nizam shah |

    (B). Battle of Bhatvadi was one of the decisive battles in the history of Deccan won by Malik Ambar

    (C). In 1607, Malik Ambar transferred his capital to Khirki, about 10 miles from Daulatabad

    (D). Malik Ambar defeated Abdullah khan, the Governor of Gujarat

    (E). Malik Ambar's revenue system was based primarily on Raja Todarmal's model

    Choose the correct answer from the options given below:

  2. In the context of Mughal administration, the term ‘polaj’ stood for a:

  3. Match List – I (Officials) with List – II (Departments) and select the correct answer with the help of the codes given below :

    List – I (Officials)List – II (Departments)
    a. Lakshanadhyakshai. Superintendent of Mints
    b. Sitadhyakshaii. Superintendent of Commerce
    c. Pautavadhyakshaiii. Superintendent of Agriculture
    d. Panyadhyakshaiv. Superintendent of Weights and Measures

     

  4. Who among the following officers was not a functionary under the Mauryan Administration ?
  5. Who among the following used to look after the army during the Sultanate period ?
Need Expert Advice?

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App