Let $p$ and $q$ be any two propositions. Consider the following propositional statements.
$S_1: p \to q$ $S_2: \neg p \land q$ $S_3: \neg p \lor q$ $S_4 : \neg p \lor \neg q$
where $\land$ denotes conjunction (AND operation), $\lor$ denotes disjunction (OR operation), and $\neg$ denotes negation (NOT operation). Which one of the following options is correct?
(Note: $\equiv$ denotes logical equivalence)
The implication statement $p \to q$ is true in all cases except when $p$ is true and $q$ is false.
This implication is logically equivalent to the disjunction statement $\neg p \lor q$. This is a fundamental rule in propositional logic.
Based on the standard logical equivalence rule for implication:
$ p \to q \equiv \neg p \lor q $
Therefore, statement $S_1$ is logically equivalent to statement $S_3$.
$S_1 \equiv S_3$
Which of the following logical implications are tautology?
A. $[\sim p \land (p \lor q)] \rightarrow q$
B. $\sim p \rightarrow (p \rightarrow q)$
C. $[p \land (p \rightarrow q)] \rightarrow q$
D. $\sim (p \rightarrow q) \rightarrow q$
Choose the correct answer from the options given below: