In which year was the Subsidiary Alliance introduced by Lord Wellesley in Awadh?
1801
Understanding the Subsidiary Alliance in Awadh
The question asks about the specific year when the Subsidiary Alliance system, introduced by Lord Wellesley, was applied to the state of Awadh (also known as Oudh).
What was the Subsidiary Alliance System?
The Subsidiary Alliance was a treaty system used by the British East India Company to bring Indian princely states under their control without directly annexing them immediately. Introduced by Lord Wellesley, who served as the Governor-General of India from 1798 to 1805, it was a major tool for expanding British influence and power in India.
Key features of the Subsidiary Alliance included:
- The Indian ruler had to disband his own army.
- A British force was stationed in the state's territory.
- The ruler had to pay for the maintenance of the British force. If the ruler failed to pay, a part of his territory was ceded to the British.
- The ruler had to accept a British Resident at his court.
- The ruler could not enter into any alliance or declare war without the permission of the British.
- The British promised to protect the state from external enemies, but this protection often came at the cost of the ruler's sovereignty.
Lord Wellesley and the Expansion of British Power
Lord Wellesley actively pursued a policy of aggressive expansion. He believed that to secure British power in India, the Company needed to control the internal and external affairs of Indian states. The Subsidiary Alliance was his primary instrument for achieving this goal.
The Subsidiary Alliance and Awadh
Awadh was a significant state bordering the British territories. The British had existing agreements with Awadh, but under Wellesley, they pushed for the Subsidiary Alliance to be fully implemented. This was done to secure British frontiers, gain resources, and prevent the possibility of the Nawab of Awadh forming alliances with potential rivals like the French.
After negotiations and pressure, the Nawab of Awadh was compelled to accept the full terms of the Subsidiary Alliance.
When was the Subsidiary Alliance Imposed on Awadh?
The Subsidiary Alliance was imposed on Awadh by Lord Wellesley in the year 1801. This treaty forced the Nawab Saadat Ali Khan II to surrender half of his territory to the British East India Company for the payment of the British forces stationed in his state. The treaty effectively ended Awadh's independent military capacity and brought it firmly under British political control.
Analysing the Options
- 1800: While discussions and pressures might have been building around this time, the formal treaty imposing the Subsidiary Alliance on Awadh was not concluded in 1800.
- 1802: This year is after the actual signing of the treaty with Awadh.
- 1803: This year is also after the implementation of the Subsidiary Alliance in Awadh.
- 1801: This is the year when the treaty of Subsidiary Alliance was signed between the British East India Company under Lord Wellesley and the Nawab of Awadh, ceding significant territory to the British.
Based on historical records, the Subsidiary Alliance was introduced in Awadh in 1801.
| Year | Event in Awadh | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| 1801 | Treaty of Subsidiary Alliance signed with Nawab Saadat Ali Khan II. | Awadh accepts full terms of Subsidiary Alliance, cedes territory, loses military independence. |
Revision Table: Key Subsidiary Alliances by Lord Wellesley
| State | Approximate Year of Alliance |
|---|---|
| Hyderabad | 1798 |
| Mysore | 1799 |
| Awadh | 1801 |
| Peshwa (Maratha Confederacy) | 1802 (Treaty of Bassein) |
| Scindia (Maratha Confederacy) | 1803 |
| Gaekwad (Baroda) | 1805 |
Additional Information: Impact of Subsidiary Alliance
The Subsidiary Alliance had profound effects on the Indian states that accepted it and on the British East India Company:
- Loss of Sovereignty: Rulers lost their independence in foreign policy and military matters. They could not maintain their own armies or negotiate with other states.
- Financial Burden: The cost of maintaining the subsidiary force was often a heavy burden on the state's treasury, sometimes leading to the cession of territory due to non-payment.
- Internal Weakness: The protection offered by the British removed the need for rulers to maintain efficient administration or build loyalty among their subjects, as they were protected by British forces. This often led to misgovernance.
- Expansion of British Control: The system allowed the British to maintain large armies at the expense of Indian states and exert political influence and control over vast territories without direct annexation, paving the way for future direct rule.
- Economic Exploitation: The cession of territories and financial demands further facilitated the economic drain from India to Britain.
The Subsidiary Alliance in Awadh in 1801 was a critical step in the British consolidation of power in Northern India.
Important Questions from Colonialism and the Countryside
Which Government set up a commission of enquiry to investigate into the causes of the Deccan Riots?
Arrange the following in a chronological manner:
A. Permanent Settlement was introduced in Bengal.
B. English East India Company acquires ‘Diwani’ of Bengal.
C. Santhal Revolt in Rajmahal hills.
D. First revenue settlement was started in Bombay Deccan.
E. Ryots rebelled in Deccan villages.
Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
Read the passage and answer the question:
Who were these hill folk? Why were they so apprehensive of Buchanan's visit? Buchanan’s journal gives us tantalising glimpses of these hill folk in the early nineteenth century. His journal was written as a diary of places he visited, people he encountered, and practices he saw. It raises questions in our mind, but does not always help us answer them. It tells us about a moment in time, but not about the longer history of people and places. For that, historians have to turn to other records.
Which of the following is false?
Read the passage and answer the question:
Who were these hill folk? Why were they so apprehensive of Buchanan's visit? Buchanan’s journal gives us tantalising glimpses of these hill folk in the early nineteenth century. His journal was written as a diary of places he visited, people he encountered, and practices he saw. It raises questions in our mind, but does not always help us answer them. It tells us about a moment in time, but not about the longer history of people and places. For that, historians have to turn to other records.
Buchanan's survey gives glimpses of hill folks during which century?
Read the passage and answer the question:
Who were these hill folk? Why were they so apprehensive of Buchanan's visit? Buchanan’s journal gives us tantalising glimpses of these hill folk in the early nineteenth century. His journal was written as a diary of places he visited, people he encountered, and practices he saw. It raises questions in our mind, but does not always help us answer them. It tells us about a moment in time, but not about the longer history of people and places. For that, historians have to turn to other records.
Who were the 'hill folk' referred in the passage above?
