All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

In this question, three statements are given, followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follows/follow from the statements.
Statements:
Some raisins are grapes.
All grapes are apples.
All raisins are fruits.
Conclusions:
I. Some fruits are apples.
II. Some apples are raisins.

The correct answer is
Both conclusions I and II follow.

Statement Conclusion Logic Problems

This problem involves analyzing logical statements and conclusions to determine their validity. We need to check if the given conclusions can be logically derived from the provided statements.

Analyzing Given Statements

  • Statement 1: Some raisins are grapes. (This indicates a partial overlap between the set of raisins and the set of grapes.)
  • Statement 2: All grapes are apples. (This means the entire set of grapes is contained within the set of apples.)
  • Statement 3: All raisins are fruits. (This means the entire set of raisins is contained within the set of fruits.)

Intermediate Conclusion Derivation

Let's combine the first two statements:

  • From Statement 1, we know there exists at least one raisin that is also a grape.
  • From Statement 2, we know that every grape is an apple.
  • Therefore, if there's a raisin that is a grape, and all grapes are apples, then that specific raisin must also be an apple.
  • This allows us to derive an intermediate conclusion: Some raisins are apples.

Conclusion I: Some fruits are apples

Now, let's evaluate Conclusion I using the statements and our derived conclusion:

  • We know from Statement 3: All raisins are fruits.
  • We derived: Some raisins are apples.
  • Since all the raisins mentioned in "All raisins are fruits" are indeed fruits, and we know some of these raisins are also apples, it logically follows that those specific raisins represent fruits that are also apples.
  • Therefore, Some fruits are apples. Conclusion I logically follows.

Conclusion II: Some apples are raisins

Let's evaluate Conclusion II:

  • We derived the statement: Some raisins are apples.
  • This statement means that there is at least one member that belongs to both the 'raisins' category and the 'apples' category.
  • The statement "Some A are B" is logically equivalent to "Some B are A".
  • Thus, "Some raisins are apples" logically implies Some apples are raisins. Conclusion II logically follows.

Overall Validity

Based on the step-by-step analysis:

  • Conclusion I is valid.
  • Conclusion II is valid.

Both conclusions logically follow from the given statements.

Was this answer helpful?

Important Questions from Syllogism

  1. Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

    Statements:

    Some students are players.

    All players are male.

    Conclusions:

    I. All males are players.

    II. Some males are students.

  2. Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

    Statements:

    No creative is an employer.

    All experts are creative.

    All workers are experts.

    Conclusions:

    I. No employer is an expert.

    II. No worker is an employer.

  3. Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

    Statements:

    Some actors are choreographers.

    All choreographers are producers.

    Not a single producer is a director.

    Conclusions:

    I. Some actors are directors.

    II. Not a single actor is a director.

  4. Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

    Statements : 

    1. All flowers are tulips.

    2. No tulips are whites.

    Conclusions :

    I. All tulips are flowers.

    II. Some tulips are whites.

  5. Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.

    Statements:

    All rats are dogs.

    Some rats are hens.

    Conclusions:

    I. Some rats are dogs.

    II. Some hens are rats.

Need Expert Advice?

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App