All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument.

Statement: Should the sale of alcohol near highways be banned?

Argument I: No, people should have the freedom to decide as it is their fundamental right.

Argument II: Yes, 90% of road accidents involve drivers who are under influence of alcohol.

The correct answer is

If only argument II is strong.

The solution is as follows:

Verdict

Only Argument II is strong.

Reasoning

Argument I is Weak: "Fundamental rights" are not absolute and can be restricted for public safety. It is a vague, subjective claim that does not address the specific danger of drinking and driving.

Argument II is Strong: It provides a direct, logical link between alcohol consumption and road safety. Since the primary goal of highway regulation is the prevention of accidents, this argument is highly relevant and addresses a significant public interest.

Was this answer helpful?

Important Questions from Statements and Arguments

  1. A question is given followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the question.

    Question:

    Should plastic bags be banned in India?

    Arguments:

    I. Yes, it is one of the sources of pollution and causes many diseases.

    II. No, other alternatives of plastic may not be that colourful and attractive.
  2. A question is given followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the question.

    Question:

    Should all criminals be given severe punishments?

    Arguments:

    1. Yes. It will induce fear in criminals and crime would reduce greatly.

    2. No. Human life is precious, and criminals should also be given a chance to improve.

  3. A question is given followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the question.

    Question:

    Are joint families better than nuclear families?

    Arguments:

    1. Yes, joint families ensure security and the burden of work is shared.

    2. No, nuclear families ensure freedom and there is no disturbance.

  4. A question is given followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the question.

    Question:

    Should vegetarian food be banned in India?

    Arguments:

    I. No, it is cheap source of protein and other minerals and a lot of people can afford it.

    II. No, it will violate people's freedom.

  5. A question is given followed by two arguments. Decide which of the arguments is/are strong with respect to the question.

    Question:

    Should there be no uniform for school children like college students?

    Arguments:

    I. Yes, students should be given freedom to wear the clothes of their choice.

    II. No, Uniform helps to create discipline and equality among students.

Need Expert Advice?

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App