All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

In the history of Indian coinage, Punch- Marked coins have a special place. Which of the following statements are true with reference to 'Punch-Marked Coins'
(i) They are the earliest coinage in India.
(ii) We can notice symbols on one or both sides of these coins.
(iii) They were not in circulation in South India.
(iv) These coins are made of silver.

The correct answer is
(i), (ii) and (iv)

Punch-Marked Coins: Historical Significance

Punch-marked coins hold a crucial position in the numismatic history of India. These coins represent one of the earliest forms of indigenous currency used in the Indian subcontinent. Understanding the characteristics of these coins is key to answering questions about their origin, appearance, distribution, and composition. Let's analyze each statement provided in the question.

Earliest Coinage in India

Statement (i): "They are the earliest coinage in India."

This statement is considered true. Punch-marked coins are widely regarded as the earliest indigenous coinage of India. They originated around the 6th century BCE, during the Mahajanapada period, predating many other forms of currency and influence from foreign empires. Their introduction marked a significant advancement in India's economic history.

Symbols on Punch-Marked Coins

Statement (ii): "We can notice symbols on one or both sides of these coins."

This statement is also considered true. The production method involved cutting small pieces of metal (typically silver) and then striking them with one or more punches to imprint symbols. Common symbols included representations of animals (like elephants, bulls, fish), celestial bodies (sun, moon), plants, and geometric patterns. While some coins might have symbols on only one side, it was common for multiple symbols to be impressed on both sides.

Circulation in South India

Statement (iii): "They were not in circulation in South India."

This statement is considered false. Archaeological evidence, including coin hoards discovered in various sites across the Indian subcontinent, indicates that punch-marked coins had a wide circulation. Their use extended to regions in South India as well. Trade networks were extensive, and these coins served as a medium of exchange across different geographical areas.

Material of Punch-Marked Coins

Statement (iv): "These coins are made of silver."

This statement is generally considered true. The most common and widely recognized punch-marked coins were made of silver. These were often referred to as 'Karshapana' or 'Pana' and were issued in various weights. While some punch-marked coins were also made of copper, silver was the predominant metal used for the significant issues of this era.

Conclusion on Statements

Based on the historical and numismatic understanding:

  • Statement (i) is true.
  • Statement (ii) is true.
  • Statement (iii) is false.
  • Statement (iv) is true.

Therefore, the true statements are (i), (ii), and (iv).

Was this answer helpful?

Important Questions from Ancient History

  1. Which of the following archaeological sites is located on the bank of river Mahanadi and has temples/monuments of Buddhism, Hinduism and Jainism?

  2. Polygynous family is represented by

  3. The following are the archealogical sources of Indian history :

    (a) Stone inscriptions

    (b) Copper plates

    (c) Leaf inscriptions

    (d) Pillar inscriptions

    Select the correct answer -

  4. Regarding the Indus Valley Civilization, consider the following statements: 

    1) It was predominantly a secular civilization and the religious element, though present, did not dominate the scene. 

    2) During this period, cotton was used for manufacturing textiles in India. 

    Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  5. Who founded the Rashtrakuta empire?

Need Expert Advice?

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App