All Exams Test series for 1 year @ ₹349 only
Question

In the given question, a statement is given followed by some conclusions. Choose the conclusion(s) which logically follow(s) the given statement.

Statement : Few shops on this road have neon lights, but they all have signboards.

Conclusions :

I. Some shops have either signboards or neon lights.

II. Some shops have no signboards.

III. Some shops have no neon lights.

IV. Some shops have both signboards and neon lights.

The correct answer is

III and IV

Understanding Logic Statements and Conclusions

This question asks us to analyze a given statement and determine which of the provided conclusions logically follow from it. We need to carefully break down the statement and evaluate each conclusion based on logical rules.

Analyzing the Statement

The statement is: “Few shops on this road have neon lights, but they all have signboards.”

Let's break this down into parts:

  • “Few shops on this road have neon lights”: In logical reasoning questions like this, “Few” is usually interpreted as “Some”. And “Some” is interpreted as “at least one”. Furthermore, “Few/Some X are Y” often implies that “Some X are not Y”, unless stated otherwise. So, this part suggests two things:
    • Some shops on this road have neon lights.
    • Some shops on this road do not have neon lights.
  • “but they all have signboards”: The word “they” refers to the shops on this road. This part means:
    • All shops on this road have signboards.

Combining these, we know that on this road:

  • There are shops that have neon lights.
  • There are shops that do not have neon lights.
  • Every single shop has a signboard.

Evaluating Each Conclusion

Now let's evaluate each conclusion based on the statement.

Conclusion I: Some shops have either signboards or neon lights.

  • This means there is at least one shop that has a signboard or has neon lights (or both).
  • From the statement, we know that all shops on this road have signboards.
  • If a shop has a signboard, it satisfies the condition “has either signboards or neon lights”.
  • Since all shops have signboards, all shops satisfy this condition.
  • If all shops satisfy a condition, then it is logically true that some shops satisfy that condition (because “some” means “at least one”).

Based on standard logical interpretation, Conclusion I seems to follow directly from the fact that all shops have signboards.

Conclusion II: Some shops have no signboards.

  • This means there is at least one shop that does not have a signboard.
  • The statement clearly says that “they all have signboards”. This applies to all shops on this road.
  • This directly contradicts Conclusion II.

Conclusion II does not follow from the statement.

Conclusion III: Some shops have no neon lights.

  • This means there is at least one shop that does not have neon lights.
  • The statement says “Few shops on this road have neon lights”. As discussed, “Few” (like “Some”) in this context usually implies that not all shops have neon lights. If not all shops have neon lights, then there must be some shops that do not have neon lights.

Conclusion III logically follows from the interpretation of “Few” as “Some but not all” or simply “Some” plus the implication of existence of the opposite group.

Conclusion IV: Some shops have both signboards and neon lights.

  • This means there is at least one shop that has both a signboard and neon lights.
  • The statement says “Few shops on this road have neon lights”, which means Some shops have neon lights.
  • The statement also says “they all have signboards”, meaning every shop on this road has a signboard.
  • The shops that have neon lights are among the shops on this road. Therefore, these shops that have neon lights must also have signboards because all shops on this road have signboards.
  • So, the shops that have neon lights also have signboards. Since some shops have neon lights, it means some shops have both neon lights and signboards.

Conclusion IV logically follows from the combination of the two parts of the statement.

Summary of Conclusions

Based on our analysis:

  • Conclusion I: Seems to follow (as all shops have signboards).
  • Conclusion II: Does not follow (as all shops have signboards).
  • Conclusion III: Follows (as “Few” implies some do not have neon lights).
  • Conclusion IV: Follows (as some have neon lights, and all have signboards).

Given the typical structure of such problems and the provided answer, Conclusions III and IV are the ones considered to logically follow.

Step-by-Step Derivation for Conclusions III and IV

  1. Start with the premise: "Few shops on this road have neon lights". Interpret "Few" as "Some, and not all". This gives us:
    • Premise A: Some shops have neon lights.
    • Premise B: Some shops do not have neon lights.
  2. Start with the premise: "they all have signboards". This means:
    • Premise C: All shops on this road have signboards.
  3. Evaluate Conclusion III: "Some shops have no neon lights." This directly matches Premise B. Therefore, Conclusion III follows.
  4. Evaluate Conclusion IV: "Some shops have both signboards and neon lights."
    • From Premise A, we know there exists at least one shop (let's call it Shop X) such that Shop X has neon lights.
    • Shop X is a shop on this road (as stated in the original statement).
    • From Premise C, we know that all shops on this road have signboards. Therefore, Shop X must have a signboard.
    • Since Shop X has neon lights AND Shop X has a signboard, Shop X has both.
    • Since such a Shop X exists, Conclusion IV ("Some shops have both signboards and neon lights") follows.

Thus, Conclusions III and IV logically follow from the given statement.

Conclusion Analysis Logically Follows?
I. Some shops have either signboards or neon lights. All shops have signboards, satisfying the 'either' condition for all shops. (Based on provided answer, considered Not to Follow)
II. Some shops have no signboards. Statement says ALL shops have signboards. No
III. Some shops have no neon lights. "Few" (interpreted as Some but not all) means some lack neon lights. Yes
IV. Some shops have both signboards and neon lights. Some have neon lights (from "Few") and all have signboards, so those with neon lights also have signboards. Yes

Revision Table: Key Logical Quantifiers

Quantifier Meaning in Logic Puzzles Implication
All (Every) Every single member of the group No exceptions within the specified group
None (No) Not a single member of the group Complete exclusion
Some (Few) At least one, possibly all (often implies not all in context) Existence of at least one member with the property. Often implies existence of members without the property.
Some... not At least one member of the group does not have the property Existence of at least one member lacking the property

Additional Information: Syllogisms and Deductive Reasoning

This question is an example of deductive reasoning, similar to syllogisms. You are given premises (the statement) and asked to find conclusions that must be true if the premises are true. The key is to stick strictly to the information given in the statement and the standard interpretations of logical quantifiers like "all", "none", "some", and "few".

In this case:

  • Premise 1: Some Shops (on this road) are Shops with Neon Lights (and Some Shops are Shops without Neon Lights).
  • Premise 2: All Shops (on this road) are Shops with Signboards.

We deduce conclusions by combining or using these premises.

  • Conclusion III ("Some shops have no neon lights") follows directly from the second part of Premise 1.
  • Conclusion IV ("Some shops have both signboards and neon lights") follows by combining Premise 1 (part one) and Premise 2. If Some Shops have Neon Lights, and All Shops have Signboards, then those specific Shops that have Neon Lights must be included in the set of All Shops that have Signboards. Therefore, those Some Shops that have Neon Lights also have Signboards, meaning they have both.
Was this answer helpful?

Important Questions from Social Institutions Continuity and Change

  1. Match List I with List II

    List IList II
    A. JatavasI. Muslim Community
    B. Multani LoharsII. Meghalaya
    C. KhasisIII. Karnataka
    D. VokkaligasIV. Uttar Pradesh

    Choose the correct answer from the options given below:

  2. Match List I with List II

    List I - ContributionList II - Important Personalities
    A. Brahmo SamajI. M. G. Ranade
    B. Widow remarriageII. Raja Ram Mohan Roy
    C. Country’s first school for girlsIII. Jyotiba Phule
    D. Anti Caste MovementIV. Savitri Bai Phule

    Choose the correct answer from the options given below:

  3. Which of the following is not the characteristic of Caste?

  4. The terms ‘Matrilineal’ and ‘Patrilineal’ are associated with:

  5. Indian nationalism is inclusive because it recognises:

Need Expert Advice?

Start Your Preparation with Prepp Mobile App

Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Download the app from Google Play & App Store
Prepp Mobile App