Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements.
Statements:
I. Some fan are table.
II. All fan are kite.
Conclusions:
I. Some kite are table.
II. All table are fan.
III. All kite are fan.
We are given two statements and three conclusions. We need to determine which conclusions logically follow from the statements, assuming the statements are true.
From statement I, we know there's an overlap between 'fan' and 'table'. From statement II, we know that all 'fan' are also 'kite'. Therefore, the 'fan' that are 'table' must also be 'kite'. This means there is an overlap between 'kite' and 'table'. Thus, Conclusion I logically follows.
Statement I only states that 'Some fan are table'. It does not provide information about *all* tables. There could be tables that are not fans. Thus, Conclusion II does not logically follow.
Statement II states 'All fan are kite'. This means the set of 'fan' is a subset of the set of 'kite'. It does not imply the reverse, that 'all kite are fan'. There could be kite that are not fan. Thus, Conclusion III does not logically follow.
Based on the analysis, only Conclusion I logically follows from the given statements.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
Some students are players.
All players are male.
Conclusions:
I. All males are players.
II. Some males are students.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
No creative is an employer.
All experts are creative.
All workers are experts.
Conclusions:
I. No employer is an expert.
II. No worker is an employer.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
Some actors are choreographers.
All choreographers are producers.
Not a single producer is a director.
Conclusions:
I. Some actors are directors.
II. Not a single actor is a director.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements :
1. All flowers are tulips.
2. No tulips are whites.
Conclusions :
I. All tulips are flowers.
II. Some tulips are whites.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
All rats are dogs.
Some rats are hens.
Conclusions:
I. Some rats are dogs.
II. Some hens are rats.