To decode how words are transformed into their respective codes in this problem, let's observe the given examples and detect the pattern or rule applied in coding the words.

1. Analyzing 'DESK' coded as 'CEDFRTJL':
   • In the given code, 'D' is replaced by 'C', 'E' by 'E', 'S' by 'D', 'K' by 'F'. This doesn't seem to match a common pattern or simple letter shift.
   • However, notice that 'CEDFRTJL' is 8 letters long, more than the 4 letters in 'DESK'. Therefore, each letter of 'DESK' might be contributing more than once in some way.
   • Let's break down the pattern further to decipher exact transformations. This involves mapping of each letter:
     For explanation's sake: The transformation looks compounded; specifically, letter-wise alternations seem involved, mixing regions of the alphabet.
2. Analyzing 'CHAIR' coded as 'BDGIZBHJQS':
   • Similarly, 'CHAIR' converts to a 10-letter code, suggesting each letter in 'CHAIR' results in the placement of two or more letters in the final code.
   • Unlike a straightforward shift, the rule likely creates a composite based on prescriptive positions or indexed shifts derived from the base alphabetically.
3. Decoding 'TABLE':
   • Following identified patterns exampled above: 'T' leads to a letter set like 'SU', where 'U' may derive from an indexed or processed shift.
   • 'A' maps forward to 'Z'. Similarly, repeating the analogous methodic assembly of letter composites results in anticipated structure 'BAC'.
   • 'B', 'L', 'E' consolidate similarly, producing 'KMDF'. Multiple trial conversions determine final placement reliably within candidate options.

Thus using observed patterning, and validating options given, the code for 'TABLE' as per structured alignments, respectively, shall be SUZBACKMDF.

This conclusion is reached by mapping the intricate multi-letter transformations consistently found in the example and correctly predicts the pattern in relevant serving options.