Understanding the Statements on Industrial System and Family System

This question asks us to evaluate two statements concerning the relationship between the industrial system, the family system, and the demand for emotional satisfaction.

Analysis of Statement 1: Industrial System and Emotional Satisfaction

Statement 1 posits that "The industrial system has increased the demand of emotional satisfaction." Let's break this down:

• Industrial System Characteristics: Industrialization often involves large-scale production, mechanization, and a shift from agrarian societies to urban centers. This can lead to work environments that are impersonal, hierarchical, and focused primarily on efficiency and output.
• Impact on Individuals: The nature of industrial work can sometimes lead to alienation, routine tasks, and a separation between work life and personal life. This environment might not inherently fulfill deep emotional needs for connection, belonging, or personal meaning.
• Increased Demand: Consequently, individuals may seek greater emotional fulfillment and satisfaction in their personal lives, particularly within the family or social relationships, to compensate for the potentially less emotionally rich experiences at work. This creates an increased 'demand' for emotional satisfaction in non-work spheres.

Therefore, Statement 1 is generally considered true within sociological analysis of modernization.

Analysis of Statement 2: Family System and Industrialisation

Statement 2 suggests that "The family system is attuned to serve the needs of industrialisation." Consider the historical evolution:

• Pre-Industrial Families: In agrarian societies, families often functioned as units of production, with members working together (e.g., on a farm).
• Changes during Industrialisation: As industrialisation progressed, work moved outside the home into factories. The family structure adapted. The nuclear family model became more common, facilitating easier migration to urban areas for work.
• Serving Industrial Needs: The family's role shifted towards socialization (raising children to become future workers and citizens conforming to societal norms), emotional support for workers, and consumption. This structure supported the mobility and labor requirements of the industrial economy.

Thus, Statement 2 reflects the way social institutions, including the family, often adapt to the prevailing economic system, in this case, industrialisation.

Conclusion on Both Statements

Based on the analysis, both Statement 1 and Statement 2 appear to be accurate observations regarding the interplay between industrial society, individual psychological needs, and the structure/function of the family.

Statement 1 highlights a consequence of industrial work on individual emotional needs.

Statement 2 describes the adaptive role the family plays in supporting an industrial economy.

Therefore, the conclusion is that both statements are true.