From the following, which one is NOT the principle of Parliamentary Government of India?
The question asks to identify which option is NOT a principle of the Parliamentary Government of India. Let's examine each option in the context of India's political system.
Option B, Clear division of power among Legislature, Executive and Judiciary, is the correct answer as it represents the principle of separation of powers, which is characteristic of a Presidential system, not the Parliamentary system found in India.
In India's parliamentary government:
Conversely, a strict separation of powers is a hallmark of systems like the United States presidency.
The other options listed are indeed key principles or features of the Indian parliamentary government:
Therefore, the concept of a clear division of powers is fundamentally different from the operational principles of India's parliamentary system.
Consider the following statements :
1. In order to form a new state in the Indian Union, the Parliament can amend the provisions of the Constitution with a Simple Majority.
2. To amend the provisions of Directive Principles of State Policy, the Parliament requires a Special Majority.
3. To amend Article 368 of the Constitution, the Parliament requires Special Majority along with the consent of half of the state legislatures.
How many of the statements given above are correct?