Tables I and II below present analysis of people involved in a total of 10,000 road accidents which happened in Delhi during the year 2020 in accordance to both analysis of severity and fatalities. Taking it. on an average three (3) people were involved in each road accident. In accordance with the data in the tables. answer the questions: Table - I: Analysis of Severity Uninjured 47% First-Aid Required 6% Mild Bruises 9% Hospitalization 19% Fatalities 19% Table - II: Analysis of Fatalities Head Injuries 69% Damage to Internal Organs 21% Fire Casuality 3% Blood-Loss 7%
From the data in Tables I and II, it can be concluded that:
the likelihood of surviving an accident is greater than that of dying in an accident
Let's analyze the data provided in the tables about road accidents in Delhi during the year 2020. We are given that there were a total of 10,000 road accidents, and on average, three people were involved in each accident. This means the total number of people involved in these accidents is:
Total people involved = Total accidents × Average people per accident
Total people involved = $10,000 \times 3 = 30,000$ people
Table I breaks down the 30,000 people involved based on the severity of the outcome:
| Severity | Percentage of People Involved |
|---|---|
| Uninjured | 47% |
| First-Aid Required | 6% |
| Mild Bruises | 9% |
| Hospitalization | 19% |
| Fatalities | 19% |
Based on these percentages, we can calculate the number of people in each category:
Let's quickly verify the total number of people: $14,100 + 1,800 + 2,700 + 5,700 + 5,700 = 30,000$. This matches the total number of people involved.
Table II provides an analysis of the causes of the fatalities (the 19% or 5,700 people mentioned above):
| Cause of Fatality | Percentage of Fatalities |
|---|---|
| Head Injuries | 69% |
| Damage to Internal Organs | 21% |
| Fire Casuality | 3% |
| Blood-Loss | 7% |
This table tells us why people died, but it is based on the percentage of people who were fatalities, not the total number of people involved in accidents.
Now let's evaluate each of the given conclusions based on the data in Tables I and II.
Conclusion 1: drunken driving is dangerous.
The provided tables contain information about the severity of outcomes and causes of fatalities. They do not provide any data about the causes of the accidents themselves, such as drunken driving. Therefore, we cannot conclude this statement from the given data.
Conclusion 2: more accidents happen at night because of fatigue and poor visibility.
The tables do not contain any information about the time of day the accidents occurred or factors like fatigue and visibility. This conclusion cannot be drawn based on the data provided.
Conclusion 3: motorcycle drivers are at a greater risk of being involved in an accident than automobile drivers.
The data in the tables is aggregated for all people involved in road accidents. It does not differentiate between types of vehicles or the roles of the people involved (driver, passenger, pedestrian, etc.). Therefore, we cannot conclude anything about the relative risk for different types of drivers from this data.
Conclusion 4: the likelihood of surviving an accident is greater than that of dying in an accident.
From Table I, we know the percentage of people who were fatalities is 19%. The people who survived are everyone who was not a fatality. This includes those who were Uninjured, required First-Aid, had Mild Bruises, or required Hospitalization.
Percentage of people who survived = Percentage Uninjured + Percentage First-Aid Required + Percentage Mild Bruises + Percentage Hospitalization
Percentage of people who survived = $47\% + 6\% + 9\% + 19\%$
Percentage of people who survived = $81\%$
Comparing the likelihood (percentage) of surviving to the likelihood (percentage) of dying:
Since $81\%$ is much greater than $19\%$, the likelihood of surviving an accident is indeed greater than that of dying in an accident, according to the data in Table I.
Based on the analysis of the options against the provided data, only the fourth conclusion can be supported by the information in Table I.
| Metric | Value/Percentage | Source Table | Relevance to Conclusions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Accidents (2020, Delhi) | 10,000 | Problem Statement | Context for total people involved |
| Avg People per Accident | 3 | Problem Statement | Context for total people involved |
| Total People Involved | 30,000 | Calculation | Basis for severity percentages |
| Fatalities | 19% of people involved | Table I | Directly used for conclusion 4 |
| Survived (Non-Fatalities) | 81% of people involved | Table I (calculated) | Directly used for conclusion 4 |
| Fatal Causes (e.g., Head Injuries) | Percentages of Fatalities | Table II | Details about *why* people died (subset of fatalities) |
Analyzing road accident data is crucial for improving traffic safety. Data can be categorized in many ways, including:
The tables provided focus specifically on the outcomes for people involved (severity) and the medical reasons for death among fatalities. While useful, a complete picture for devising safety measures would require data on causes, locations, and vehicle types.
The table shows District-wise data of a number of primary school teachers posted in schools of a city.
Study the table and answer the question:
District | Male teachers | Female teachers |
East | 1650 | 2375 |
North | 1075 | 2651 |
West | 1280 | 1520 |
South | 1170 | 1085 |
Central | 690 | 859 |
Table shows income (in Rs. ) received by 4 employees of a company during the month of December 2020 and all their income sources.
Source | Amit | Suresh | Nitin | Varun |
Salary | 35000 | 38500 | 29000 | 42000 |
Arrears | 6000 | 6300 | 5000 | 7500 |
Bonus | 1000 | 1100 | 1000 | 1240 |
Overtime | 1800 | 1950 | 1400 | 1500 |
Study the table and answer the question:
Income (Rs.) | No. of persons |
Less than 200 | 12 |
Less than 250 | 26 |
Less than 300 | 34 |
Less than 350 | 40 |
Less than 400 | 50 |
The following table shows the annual profit of a company (in Rs. lakh).
2014-2015 | 2015-2016 | 2016-0217 | 2017-2018 | 2018-2019 |
625 | 690 | 725 | 775 | 815 |
The period which has the maximum percentage increase in profit over the previous year is:
The table given below shows the number of persons participating in a survey from 6 different states.
| States | Persons |
| S1 | 100 |
| S2 | 200 |
| S3 | 400 |
| S4 | 500 |
| S5 | 600 |
| S6 | 800 |
What is the ratio of number of person participating in a survey from state S3 to the number of person participating in a survey from state S4?