Understanding Landmark Supreme Court Case Matches
The question asks to identify the pair that is incorrectly matched between a notable Supreme Court case and the legal issue it primarily addressed. Let's analyze each option to determine the mismatch.
Option 1: S.R. Bommai Case (1994) - President's Rule
The S.R. Bommai Case, decided in 1994, is a landmark judgment concerning the imposition of President's Rule under Article 356 of the Constitution. The Supreme Court laid down crucial guidelines and limitations on the powers of the Union government to dismiss state governments and dissolve state assemblies. This match is correct.
Option 2: Unni Krishnan Case (1993) - Right to Education
The Unni Krishnan Case (often referred to as the Unni Krishnan JP v. State of Andhra Pradesh case) was decided in 1993. A significant aspect of this judgment was the Supreme Court's declaration that the Right to Education is a fundamental right flowing from the Right to Life (Article 21). This match is correct.
Option 3: Prakash Singh Case (2006) - Judicial Reforms
The Prakash Singh Case, decided in 2006, is indeed a very important judgment. However, its primary focus was on police reforms, not judicial reforms. The Supreme Court issued directives aimed at improving police accountability, efficiency, and independence. Issues like ensuring the tenure of police chiefs, separating investigation from law and order functions, and establishing police complaints authorities were central to this case. Therefore, matching it with 'Judicial Reforms' is incorrect.
Option 4: M. Nagaraj Case (2006) - Reservation
The M. Nagaraj Case (2006) dealt with the constitutional validity of providing for reservations in government jobs based on caste. Specifically, it examined the extent to which the state could provide for reservations in favour of the Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) in matters of promotion, considering the 'creamy layer' and the need for quantifiable data on backwardness. This match is correct.
Conclusion
Based on the analysis, the pair that is not correctly matched is the Prakash Singh Case (2006) with Judicial Reforms. The Prakash Singh Case is fundamentally associated with police reforms.
Important Questions from Judiciary
Who appoints the judges of the Supreme Court?
If a question arises about the age of a Judge of a High Court, who will decide about this matter?
How Supreme Court protects the Supremacy of the Constitution ?
i. By due process of law
ii. By procedure established by law
In the context of judicial Review what is a duty of Supreme Court:
In a federal system why a Judiciary is essential ?
a. To enterprete the Constitution
b. To protect the Fundamental Rights
c. To protect the Supremacy of the Constitution
d. To protect Democratic system
e. To settle disputes between centre and states
f. To protect parliamentary system
