Consider two subsets of R 3given as S 1= {[1, -1, 2], [3, 2, -1]} and S 2= {[2, 7, -3],[-6, -21, 9]}. Then:
S 1can be enlarged but S 2 cannot be enlarged to a basis for R 3
To determine if a set of vectors can be enlarged to a basis for $\text{R}^{3}$, we first need to understand the concept of a basis and linear independence. A basis for a vector space like $\text{R}^{3}$ is a set of vectors that are:
For $\text{R}^{3}$, any basis must contain exactly three linearly independent vectors. If a given set of vectors is linearly independent and its size is less than the dimension of the space (i.e., less than 3 for $\text{R}^{3}$), then it can be enlarged to a basis by adding more linearly independent vectors. However, if the given set of vectors is linearly dependent, it cannot be enlarged to a basis, because a basis must always consist of linearly independent vectors.
We are given the first subset $\text{S}_{1} = \{[1, -1, 2], [3, 2, -1]\}$. To check if $\text{S}_{1}$ can be enlarged to a basis for $\text{R}^{3}$, we must first determine if its vectors are linearly independent. For two vectors, they are linearly dependent if and only if one is a scalar multiple of the other. Let's check if there is a scalar $c$ such that $[3, 2, -1] = c \cdot [1, -1, 2]$.
Since we obtain different values for $c$ for each component ($3, -2, -\frac{1}{2}$), there is no single scalar $c$ that satisfies the equation. This means that the vector $[3, 2, -1]$ is not a scalar multiple of $[1, -1, 2]$.
Therefore, the two vectors in $\text{S}_{1}$ are linearly independent. Since $\text{S}_{1}$ contains two linearly independent vectors in $\text{R}^{3}$ (and $2 < 3$), it means that these vectors form a linearly independent set that does not yet span $\text{R}^{3}$. We can add one more vector that is linearly independent of $[1, -1, 2]$ and $[3, 2, -1]$ to form a basis for $\text{R}^{3}$. Thus, $\text{S}_{1}$ can be enlarged to a basis for $\text{R}^{3}$.
Next, we consider the second subset $\text{S}_{2} = \{[2, 7, -3], [-6, -21, 9]\}$. We apply the same test for linear independence. Let's check if there is a scalar $k$ such that $[-6, -21, 9] = k \cdot [2, 7, -3]$.
In this case, we find a consistent scalar value $k = -3$ across all components. This means that $[-6, -21, 9] = -3 \cdot [2, 7, -3]$.
Therefore, the two vectors in $\text{S}_{2}$ are linearly dependent because one vector is a scalar multiple of the other. A set of vectors that is linearly dependent cannot be part of a basis for a vector space. If we add more vectors to a linearly dependent set, the resulting set will still be linearly dependent (unless we remove the dependent vectors, which is not what "enlarge" implies). Hence, $\text{S}_{2}$ cannot be enlarged to a basis for $\text{R}^{3}$.
Summarizing our findings:
Based on this analysis, $\text{S}_{1}$ can be enlarged but $\text{S}_{2}$ cannot be enlarged to a basis for $\text{R}^{3}$.
Consider two subsets of ℝ 2given as, S1 = {[1, -2], [3, 5]} and S2 = {[1, 1], [0, 0]}. Then,
The standard ordered basis of ℝ 2is {e 1, e 2}. Let T : ℝ 2 → ℝ 2 be the linear transformation such that T reflects the points through the line x 1= -x 2. The standard matrix of T is:
In a class, 20 students opted for physics, 17 for Maths, 12 for both physics and maths and 10 students for other subjects. The class contains how many students?
A college awarded 38 medals in Football, 15 in Basketball and 20 in Cricket. If these medals went to a total of 58 men and only 3 men got medals in all the 3 sports, how many received medals in exactly two of the 3 sports?
The set N of natural numbers is: