Simon Commission Boycott Reason

The Simon Commission was established by the British government in 1927 to review the constitutional reforms in India under the Act of 1919. A key aspect that led to widespread protest and boycott by Indian political parties was its composition. The commission consisted entirely of British members, with no Indian representation.

Statement 1 Analysis: This statement claims the boycott was due to the commission's "all-Indian composition". This is factually incorrect. The boycott occurred precisely because the commission was composed solely of British officials, which Indians viewed as a deliberate exclusion and an insult to their aspirations for self-governance.

Therefore, Statement 1 is incorrect.

Nehru Report Objective Analysis

The Nehru Report, published in 1928, was a response by Indians to the challenge posed by Lord Birkenhead, the Secretary of State for India, who had doubted the ability of Indians to draft a constitution. It was drafted by a committee headed by Pandit Motilal Nehru.

Statement 2 Analysis: This statement asserts that the Nehru Report proposed "complete independence" for India as its immediate objective. While the report did advocate for responsible self-government, its primary recommendation was for India to achieve Dominion Status within the British Commonwealth. The demand for 'Purna Swaraj' or complete independence became the Congress's main goal later, particularly after the Lahore session in 1929.

Therefore, Statement 2 is incorrect.

Conclusion on Statements

Based on the analysis:

• Statement 1 is incorrect because the Simon Commission had an all-British, not all-Indian, composition, which was the reason for the boycott.
• Statement 2 is incorrect because the Nehru Report's immediate objective was Dominion Status, not complete independence.

Since both statements are incorrect, the correct option is that neither 1 nor 2 is correct.